The smartwatch market is heating up, with both Oppo and Xiaomi offering compelling options. The Oppo Watch 3 arrives with Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 chipset, promising a significant performance boost. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi Watch S2 focuses on user-friendly features like wireless charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right wearable for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and responsiveness, the Oppo Watch 3 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1. However, the Xiaomi Watch S2 offers a more convenient charging experience with its wireless capabilities, making it ideal for those valuing simplicity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | No |
| Technology | HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 10 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 19 | Available. Released 2022, December 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Sapphire crystal front, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 43 x 37 x 11.7 mm (1.69 x 1.46 x 0.46 in) | 46 x 46 x 10.7 mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | eSIM (market/region dependent) | No |
| Weight | 31.9 g (1.13 oz) | - |
| | 5ATM water resistant | Waterproof (5ATM) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 372 x 430 pixels (~326 ppi density) | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.75 inches | 1.43 inches |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 | - |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | - |
| GPU | Adreno A702 | - |
| OS | Android Wear OS - InternationalColorOS Watch 3.0 - China | Proprietary OS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | - |
| | eMMC 4.5 | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | - | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, compass, barometer, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2, thermometer (skin temperature), body composition (BMI) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 400 mAh | Li-Po 500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, Silver, Light Gold |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oppo Watch 3
- Powerful Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 processor for smooth performance
- 4nm chipset offers improved power efficiency
- Likely optimized for detailed fitness tracking
- Charging method unspecified (likely wired)
- Battery capacity unknown
Xiaomi Watch S2
- Convenient wireless charging
- Likely a more affordable price point
- Focus on core smartwatch features
- Less powerful processor compared to Oppo Watch 3
- Performance may be limited with demanding apps
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (brightness, resolution, panel type) is missing for both devices. However, given Oppo’s history with AMOLED displays, the Watch 3 likely features a vibrant panel. The Xiaomi Watch S2, positioned as a lifestyle device, likely prioritizes aesthetics over raw display performance. Bezels will be a key differentiator, and real-world testing would be needed to assess color accuracy and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is marketed for its camera capabilities, and details are unavailable. Smartwatches generally have limited camera functionality, and this comparison will not focus on this aspect.
Performance
The Oppo Watch 3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 (4nm) chipset is the defining feature. This 4nm process node is significantly more efficient than older generation chipsets, translating to improved battery life and reduced thermal throttling during sustained use. The quad-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU provides ample processing power for apps, notifications, and fitness tracking. The Xiaomi Watch S2’s chipset is unspecified, but given its focus on convenience, it likely utilizes a less power-hungry, but also less performant, processor. Users who frequently use apps or require quick responses will benefit from the Oppo Watch 3’s superior processing capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 in the Oppo Watch 3 is designed for power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery size compared to the Xiaomi Watch S2. The Xiaomi Watch S2’s wireless charging is a significant convenience factor, eliminating the need for cables. While wireless charging is generally slower, the convenience may outweigh the speed difference for many users. Real-world testing is crucial to determine actual battery life and charging times for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Watch 3 if you need a smartwatch that can handle demanding tasks, frequent app usage, and a smoother overall experience. Its powerful processor will appeal to fitness enthusiasts who track detailed metrics and rely on quick data processing. Buy the Xiaomi Watch S2 if you prefer a hassle-free experience with the convenience of wireless charging and a focus on core smartwatch functionalities without needing top-tier processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 in the Oppo Watch 3 impact app loading times compared to the Xiaomi Watch S2?
The Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 is a significant upgrade in processing power. Expect noticeably faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Oppo Watch 3. The Xiaomi Watch S2, with its unspecified chipset, will likely experience longer loading times and potential lag when running multiple apps simultaneously.
❓ Is wireless charging on the Xiaomi Watch S2 significantly slower than wired charging on the Oppo Watch 3 (assuming the Oppo Watch 3 uses wired charging)?
Wireless charging is generally slower than wired charging. While the exact charging speeds are unknown, expect the Xiaomi Watch S2 to take longer to reach a full charge. However, the convenience of simply placing the watch on a charging pad may outweigh the slower charging speed for many users.
❓ If I primarily use my smartwatch for notifications and basic fitness tracking, is the extra processing power of the Oppo Watch 3 worth the potential cost difference?
For basic use cases like notifications and simple fitness tracking, the Oppo Watch 3’s extra processing power is likely overkill. The Xiaomi Watch S2 will handle these tasks perfectly adequately, and the cost savings could be significant. Prioritize the convenience of wireless charging if these are your primary needs.
