Xiaomi 13T vs Oppo Reno9: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer 67W charging, the 13T’s superior battery endurance seals the deal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 512GB UFS 2.2 - 256GB | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PHM110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno9
- Refined and established design aesthetic
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset for everyday tasks
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Xiaomi 13T
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi 13T
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Excellent battery life with 12:23h active use
- Potentially less refined design compared to the Reno9
- May prioritize vibrancy over color accuracy in display tuning
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno9. This makes the 13T far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the 13T’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. We lack PWM frequency data for both, but the Reno9’s panel is likely tuned for color accuracy, while the 13T prioritizes vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, the Xiaomi 13T’s marketing emphasizes its photographic capabilities, suggesting a more advanced camera system. The Reno9 likely focuses on a balanced, all-around camera experience. Without knowing sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the 13T’s positioning suggests a stronger emphasis on image quality. We can safely assume both phones will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the 13T is likely to offer more sophisticated image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno9’s 6nm Snapdragon 778G 5G. The 8200 Ultra features a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, compared to the Reno9’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, resulting in faster application loading and smoother performance. The Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s more efficient process node also contributes to better thermal management under sustained load. While both phones likely feature ample RAM, the chipset difference will be the primary determinant of performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T demonstrates superior battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101 hours. While the Reno9’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T’s longer runtime indicates a more efficient combination of battery size and power management. Both phones support 67W wired charging, with the 13T reaching 100% in 42 minutes, while the Reno9 takes 44 minutes. This difference is minimal, but the 13T’s longer battery life makes the faster charging more impactful.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 if you prioritize a refined, established design and efficient power consumption for everyday tasks. It’s a solid choice for users who don’t heavily game or demand peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you value raw processing power, extended battery life, and a brighter display for media consumption. This phone is ideal for gamers, power users, and those who frequently multitask.