Oppo Reno9 vs. vivo iQOO 11S: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and price, the Oppo Reno9 is a strong contender. However, the vivo iQOO 11S is the clear winner for gamers and power users who demand the absolute best performance and fastest charging speeds, justifying its likely higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 512GB UFS 2.2 - 256GB | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PHM110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Reno9
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Stylish design and build quality
- Competent all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly less powerful processor than the iQOO 11S
- Slower charging speeds
- May struggle with demanding games at maximum settings
vivo iQOO 11S
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Superior thermal management for sustained performance
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May have a more aggressive, gaming-focused aesthetic
Display Comparison
While specific display specs aren't provided, the Reno9 likely features a high-quality OLED panel typical of Oppo's mid-range offerings. The iQOO 11S, positioned as a performance device, likely boasts a higher refresh rate and peak brightness. The key differentiator will be panel technology; the iQOO 11S may incorporate LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the iQOO 11S's focus on immersion could lead to slightly thinner borders. Color accuracy will be crucial, and both brands typically deliver well-calibrated displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis focuses on brand tendencies. Both Oppo and vivo prioritize camera performance, but likely with different approaches. The iQOO 11S, being a flagship-focused device, likely features a larger main sensor with OIS, enabling better low-light performance and image stabilization. The Reno9 will likely emphasize computational photography and AI scene optimization. Lens apertures will be a key factor; wider apertures (lower f-number) on the iQOO 11S will allow more light, improving image quality in challenging conditions. We can expect both phones to offer capable cameras, but the iQOO 11S is likely to deliver a more versatile and higher-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a generational leap over the Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The iQOO 11S also benefits from newer Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, alongside more efficient A510 cores, compared to the Reno9’s A78 and A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the 8 Gen 2 also translates to superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. Expect the iQOO 11S to excel in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Reno9’s 67W wired charging is fast, achieving 33% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 44 minutes. However, the iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is in a different league, promising significantly faster top-ups. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 11S’s charging speed compensates for any potential capacity difference. The Reno9’s inclusion of reverse wired charging is a useful feature for topping up accessories, but the iQOO 11S’s sheer charging speed is the dominant factor for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 if you need a stylish, capable phone for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming, and value a more manageable size and potentially lower cost. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you prioritize raw performance for demanding games, intensive multitasking, and require the fastest possible charging – even if it means a larger device and a higher investment.