Oppo Reno9 vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE emerges as the stronger contender. While the Reno9 boasts incredibly fast 67W charging, the S23 FE’s Exynos 2200 (or Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the US) provides a significant performance uplift, justifying the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - InternationalOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Xclipse 920 - InternationalAdreno 730 - USA |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 512GB UFS 2.2 - 256GB | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine |
| Models | PHM110 | SM-S711B, SM-S711B/DS, SM-S711U1, SM-S711U, SM-S711W, SM-S7110, SM-S711N |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 219.95 / C$ 327.90 / £ 248.99 / € 272.00 / ₹ 34,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.76 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno9
- Incredibly fast 67W wired charging
- Likely lighter and more compact design
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Unknown display quality and brightness
- Limited software update commitment
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Significantly more powerful Exynos 2200/Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Stronger software support and updates
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially more prone to thermal throttling
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 985 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Reno9. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the Reno9’s panel specifics are unknown, Samsung’s display technology generally offers better color accuracy and viewing angles. The S23 FE’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use and HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are missing for the S23 FE, but Samsung’s flagship heritage suggests a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Reno9’s camera capabilities are not specified, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the S23 FE likely benefits from more advanced features like improved low-light performance and better dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the S23 FE is highly probable, contributing to sharper images and smoother videos. We can assume the S23 FE will have a more versatile camera system overall, despite the Reno9 potentially offering competitive results in ideal conditions.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Oppo Reno9 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), a capable mid-range processor. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is equipped with either the Exynos 2200 (International) or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (USA), both built on a more efficient 4nm process. The Exynos 2200’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 2.8 GHz, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s 3.0 GHz core, offer substantially higher peak performance than the Reno9’s Cortex-A78. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The 4nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Reno9’s CPU configuration, while octa-core, relies on older Cortex-A78 cores, limiting its overall performance ceiling.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE achieves an impressive 8:28h of active use, demonstrating strong battery optimization despite its powerful processor. The Oppo Reno9’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 67W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of charging from 0 to 33% in just 10 minutes and reaching 100% in 44 minutes. The S23 FE’s 25W charging is considerably slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. While the S23 FE’s battery life is excellent, the Reno9’s charging speed offers unparalleled convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device. The S23 FE also supports 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Reno9.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging speeds and a lightweight design, and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value portability. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE if you demand more processing power for gaming or demanding applications, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a more established software ecosystem with longer update support.