The Oppo Reno9 and Realme GT Neo 5 represent distinct approaches to the mid-to-high range smartphone market. The Reno9 prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on design and efficient power management, while the GT Neo 5 aggressively pushes the boundaries of charging technology with its groundbreaking 240W SuperDart Charge. This comparison dissects these philosophies, revealing which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, reliable experience and a more manageable price, the Oppo Reno9 is the better choice. However, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for power users who demand the absolute fastest charging speeds and are willing to accept potential trade-offs in thermal management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 - 512GB
UFS 2.2 - 256GB | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PHM110 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo Reno9
- More efficient processor for longer battery life during typical use.
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS is generally well-regarded).
- Likely more comfortable in-hand due to a potentially smaller form factor.
- Significantly slower charging speeds compared to the GT Neo 5.
- Lower peak performance, limiting demanding gaming and applications.
- Less future-proofed chipset.
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging – fastest in the market.
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor for exceptional performance.
- Potentially better gaming experience due to the more powerful chipset.
- Higher power consumption and potential for thermal throttling.
- Faster charging may degrade battery health over time (long-term concern).
- Potentially larger and heavier design.
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the specifics aren't provided. The Reno9's focus is typically on color accuracy and a comfortable viewing experience. The GT Neo 5, geared towards gaming, may prioritize a higher refresh rate, though this isn't confirmed. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone dynamically adjusts refresh rates for optimal power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, given both brands' design philosophies.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Realme GT series phones often prioritize main sensor size and image processing for vibrant, social media-ready photos. The Reno9, typically, aims for a more natural and balanced image profile. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the GT Neo 5 offers more advanced processing capabilities, potentially leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume both phones will have a multi-camera setup, but the quality of secondary sensors (ultrawide, macro) is unknown and likely similar in quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo 5’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant leap over the Oppo Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, delivers substantially higher peak performance, crucial for demanding games and applications. The 4nm process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency compared to the 778G’s 6nm node, though the GT Neo 5’s higher performance will still generate more heat. The Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G remains a capable performer for everyday tasks and less intensive gaming, but will struggle to match the GT Neo 5 in sustained workloads. The GT Neo 5 likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5’s 240W charging is its defining feature, achieving a full charge in just 10 minutes – a massive advantage over the Reno9’s 67W charging (44 minutes). While battery capacity isn't specified, the GT Neo 5’s focus on rapid charging suggests a potentially smaller battery to optimize charging speed. The Reno9’s 67W charging is still respectable, providing a 33% charge in 10 minutes, but it can’t compete with the GT Neo 5’s speed. The trade-off is likely increased heat generation during the GT Neo 5’s ultra-fast charging cycle.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 if you need a stylish, well-rounded smartphone with a dependable processor for everyday tasks, social media, and moderate gaming. Its 67W charging is more than adequate for most users. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize minimizing downtime and require the fastest possible charging – going from 0 to 100% in just 10 minutes is a significant advantage for those constantly on the move, and you enjoy pushing your phone to its limits with demanding games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT Neo 5 240W's battery degrade quickly due to the extreme charging speed?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, Realme has implemented safety measures to mitigate battery degradation. However, consistently using ultra-fast charging *can* accelerate degradation over the long term compared to slower charging methods. It's advisable to use the 240W charger only when needed and consider slower charging options for overnight top-ups.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo Reno9 powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact or PUBG?
The Snapdragon 778G can run Genshin Impact and PUBG, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It's suitable for casual gaming, but the Realme GT Neo 5’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will provide a significantly better experience with higher settings and more stable performance.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 5 240W get excessively hot during charging or gaming?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and 240W charging both generate heat. Realme has incorporated cooling solutions, but the phone *will* get warm during prolonged gaming or fast charging. Thermal throttling is possible under sustained heavy load, potentially reducing performance slightly.
