The Oppo Reno9 and Honor 80 Pro Flat represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it. The Reno9 focuses on a balanced package with a proven chipset, while the Honor 80 Pro Flat aggressively targets performance with a flagship-tier Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth daily performance and efficient battery life, the Honor 80 Pro Flat emerges as the stronger contender. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a significant performance uplift over the Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G, justifying the potential price premium. However, the Reno9 remains a viable option for those seeking a more budget-friendly experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, January 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 186 g or 193 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 - 512GB
UFS 2.2 - 256GB | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Black, Green, Pink |
| Models | PHM110 | - |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 450 EUR |
Oppo Reno9
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset for everyday tasks
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Significantly less powerful than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- May struggle with demanding games and multitasking
- Potentially lower-quality camera sensors
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Likely better camera quality and image processing
- Potentially higher price tag
- May generate more heat under sustained load
- Slightly slower charging compared to Reno9 (based on stated claims)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature OLED panels common in this price bracket. However, the Honor 80 Pro Flat, given its flagship positioning, may benefit from a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially a more sophisticated color calibration. The Reno9, being a more value-focused device, might prioritize color accuracy over absolute brightness. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Honor's build quality may feel more premium.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Honor 80 Pro Flat, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor and a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. While both phones likely offer similar features like night mode and portrait mode, the Honor 80 Pro Flat should deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Reno9 may cut corners on sensor quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 80 Pro Flat’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno9’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, delivers significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The Adreno 730 GPU in the 8+ Gen 1 also provides a massive leap in graphics performance, making it ideal for demanding games. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Reno9’s 778G is still a capable chip, but it will struggle to match the 8+ Gen 1 in graphically intensive tasks. The Honor 80 Pro Flat likely utilizes faster LPDDR5X RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both phones offer fast charging, with the Honor 80 Pro Flat at 66W and the Oppo Reno9 at 67W. The Reno9 claims 33% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 44 minutes, while the Honor 80 Pro Flat claims 3-50% in 15 minutes. While the wattage is similar, the efficiency of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 could mean the Honor 80 Pro Flat achieves comparable battery life despite potentially having a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity. Both offer 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 if you need a reliable, well-rounded smartphone with a focus on efficient power consumption and a comfortable price point. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Honor 80 Pro Flat if you prioritize raw performance for demanding games, multitasking, and future-proofing. This is the better choice for power users and those who want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 80 Pro Flat get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more efficient than previous generations, it can still generate heat under sustained load. However, Honor likely incorporates thermal management solutions like vapor chamber cooling to mitigate throttling and maintain performance. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of significant discomfort or performance degradation.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the Honor 80 Pro Flat significantly slower than the 67W on the Oppo Reno9?
The difference of 1W is unlikely to be noticeable in real-world usage. The Honor 80 Pro Flat's claim of 3-50% in 15 minutes is competitive with the Reno9's 33% in 10 minutes. Charging speed is also influenced by factors like battery temperature and cable quality.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno9 have enough power to run graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 778G in the Reno9 can run these games, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Honor 80 Pro Flat, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
