Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the 120W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Reno9 Pro+ offers a competitive package, the 13 Pro’s advancements justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | PGW110 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Sleek and refined design
- Very fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging than Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Less advanced camera system (likely)
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Higher price point
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May run hotter under sustained load (though thermal management is improved)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1253 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno9 Pro+. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior black level performance, enhancing the viewing experience for HDR content. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, but the Xiaomi’s panel is demonstrably brighter.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Reno9 Pro+. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is expected to be more advanced, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved ISP for superior image processing. The Xiaomi 13 Pro likely features a larger main sensor, enabling better low-light performance and dynamic range. While both offer photo and video capabilities, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s hardware and software integration suggest a more refined and versatile camera experience. We can assume both will have capable image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a new Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside improved Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, resulting in faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The Reno9 Pro+’s 8+ Gen 1, while still powerful, will exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load. Both devices utilize 4nm fabrication, but the Gen 2’s architectural improvements provide a clear advantage. Both phones likely use LPDDR5x RAM, but the chipset difference will be the primary performance bottleneck.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+’s 80W charging is still fast, taking 31 minutes for a full charge, but the Xiaomi offers a substantial time saving. The Xiaomi 13 Pro also supports 50W wireless charging (36 minutes to full), a feature absent on the Reno9 Pro+. While the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its endurance rating of 115 hours, matching the Reno9 Pro+, suggests efficient power management. The faster charging speeds of the Xiaomi 13 Pro mitigate any potential concerns about battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you prioritize a sleek design, exceptionally fast 80W charging, and a slightly more affordable price point. It’s ideal for users who value aesthetics and quick top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance, a cutting-edge camera system, and the convenience of both incredibly fast wired (120W) and wireless (50W) charging. This phone is geared towards power users and photography enthusiasts.