Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs. vivo X90 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

Both the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ and the vivo X90 Pro+ represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Reno9 Pro+ arrived as a refined flagship, while the X90 Pro+ launched with the latest Snapdragon silicon. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right powerhouse.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift and improved efficiency over the Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, justifying the price premium. However, the Reno9 Pro+ remains a compelling option for those seeking flagship features at a potentially lower cost.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vivo X90 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE-A, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2022, November 242022, November 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, December 02Available. Released 2022, December 06
Body
BuildGlass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frameGlass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back
Dimensions161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in)164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight192 g (6.77 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionAsahi Glass AGC DT-Star2-
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak)LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 740
OSAndroid 13, ColorOS 13Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
Single-32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanorama, HDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNo-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4700 mAhLi-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Gold, MintBlack, Red
ModelsPGW110V2227A
PriceAbout 740 EURAbout 1030 EUR

Oppo Reno9 Pro+

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Sleek and refined design
  • Fast 80W wired charging

  • Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
  • Lacks wireless charging
  • Inferior performance in demanding tasks

vivo X90 Pro+

  • Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
  • 50W wireless charging support
  • Superior performance and efficiency

  • Higher price tag
  • Potentially larger footprint
  • May run slightly warmer under extreme load

Display Comparison

While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, specific details like peak brightness and color calibration are missing. However, the focus should be on the processors powering the experience. The Reno9 Pro+’s display is likely optimized for the 8+ Gen 1, while the X90 Pro+’s display benefits from the 8 Gen 2’s improved image signal processor for potentially more accurate color reproduction. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting their flagship status.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved ISP in the X90 Pro+ provides a computational photography advantage. The X90 Pro+ is likely to exhibit superior noise reduction, dynamic range, and detail preservation, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno9 Pro+’s camera system, while capable, is limited by the processing power of the older chipset. The X90 Pro+'s ISP also supports more advanced features like 8K video recording and improved HDR capabilities.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X90 Pro+ boasts the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This is a significant upgrade over the Oppo Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) with its 3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 core. The 8 Gen 2’s architectural improvements – specifically the newer Cortex-A715 cores alongside the A710s in the Reno9 Pro+ – translate to better multi-core performance and efficiency. The X90 Pro+ will demonstrably outperform the Reno9 Pro+ in sustained workloads, minimizing thermal throttling. Both likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the 8 Gen 2’s memory controller is more efficient.

Battery Life

Both phones offer 80W wired charging, with the X90 Pro+ advertising a full charge in 33 minutes and the Reno9 Pro+ taking 31 minutes. This difference is negligible. The X90 Pro+ adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Reno9 Pro+. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior efficiency in the X90 Pro+ will likely result in longer real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Reno9 Pro+.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you prioritize a sleek design and a strong all-around experience without needing the absolute latest processing power. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming and content creation but aren’t pushing the limits of demanding applications. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the best possible performance, especially for sustained gaming or professional-level video editing, and appreciate the benefits of the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Reno9 Pro+ struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact after extended play sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a capable chip, but it's more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Expect some performance dips and potential frame rate drops in demanding games like Genshin Impact after 30-45 minutes of continuous gameplay on the Reno9 Pro+. The X90 Pro+ will maintain higher frame rates for longer.
❓ Does the vivo X90 Pro+’s 50W wireless charging significantly reduce charging times compared to wired charging?
While 50W wireless charging is fast, it's still slower than the 80W wired charging offered on both devices. Expect a full wireless charge to take around 60-75 minutes. However, it provides a convenient alternative for topping up the battery without needing a cable.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Cortex-X3 and Cortex-X2 cores noticeable in everyday tasks?
In typical everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and email, the difference between the Cortex-X3 and Cortex-X2 cores will be minimal. However, the X3 core’s architectural improvements become apparent in demanding applications like video editing, 3D rendering, and complex multitasking.