Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs. vivo iQOO 11 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day usability and a smooth experience, the vivo iQOO 11 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a significant performance leap over the Reno9 Pro+'s 8+ Gen 1, and the 200W charging is a game-changer, mitigating the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | vivo iQOO 11 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, December 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, December 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 210.5 g or 213 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (International), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 200W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 10 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PGW110 | V2254A |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 800 EUR |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Potentially more compact design
- Refined ColorOS software experience
- Slightly lower price point (likely)
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Slower 80W charging
- Lacks wireless charging
vivo iQOO 11 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Blazing-fast 200W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- Funtouch OS may not appeal to all users
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, the provided data doesn't allow for a direct comparison of display characteristics like peak brightness or color accuracy. However, the iQOO 11 Pro, being a gaming-focused device, may incorporate features like a higher touch sampling rate. The Reno9 Pro+’s focus on aesthetics might translate to slimmer bezels, but without specific measurements, this remains speculative. Both will likely support HDR10+ content.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specific camera sensor details, making a definitive comparison challenging. However, the iQOO 11 Pro, positioned as a flagship, is likely to feature a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Reno9 Pro+ may focus on computational photography and software enhancements. Without knowing the megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities. We can assume both will offer capable image stabilization, but the iQOO 11 Pro’s higher processing power could enable more sophisticated stabilization techniques.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 11 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and a more efficient GPU. The iQOO 11 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) offers a clock speed advantage and architectural improvements over the Reno9 Pro+'s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the iQOO 11 Pro’s superior chipset will better leverage its bandwidth.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11 Pro’s 200W wired charging is the standout feature here, capable of fully charging the device in just 10 minutes. This dramatically reduces downtime compared to the Reno9 Pro+'s 80W charging, which takes 31 minutes for a full charge. While the battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 11 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Reno9 Pro+. The Reno9 Pro+’s 80W charging is still fast, but the iQOO 11 Pro’s speed is in a different league. The iQOO 11 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you value a more compact form factor, a potentially more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS preference), and a slightly more approachable price point. Buy the vivo iQOO 11 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance, need incredibly rapid charging, and prioritize gaming capabilities, even if it means a larger device and potentially more aggressive software.