Both the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ and Realme GT3 leverage the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but diverge significantly in their approach to power delivery and overall user experience. The Reno9 Pro+ aims for a refined, balanced flagship experience, while the GT3 aggressively prioritizes charging speed and raw performance, making this a compelling comparison for power users and those seeking the latest in charging technology.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme GT3 emerges as the winner. Its groundbreaking 240W charging – fully charging the phone in just 10 minutes – is a massive convenience. While the Reno9 Pro+ offers a more polished software experience, the GT3’s speed and comparable performance make it the more compelling choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, July 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired | 240W wired, PD, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Pulse White, Booster Black |
| Models | PGW110 | RMX3709 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1074427 (v9)
GeekBench: 3898 (v5.1), 3980 (v6)
GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Likely more consistent camera processing
- Balanced feature set
- Significantly slower charging (31 minutes to full)
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds
Realme GT3
- Revolutionary 240W charging (10 minutes to full)
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds
- Higher peak display brightness
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling
- Software experience may be less polished
Display Comparison
The Realme GT3 boasts a peak brightness of 974 nits, a figure not provided for the Reno9 Pro+. This suggests a potentially more visible display in direct sunlight. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, given their market segments, but the GT3’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for AMOLED technology. Without knowing the Reno9 Pro+'s panel specifics (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), it’s difficult to assess display quality beyond brightness. The GT3’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. We can assume both will offer a versatile camera system, but the Reno9 Pro+’s brand reputation suggests a potentially more refined image processing algorithm. The lack of detail makes it impossible to determine a clear winner; real-world testing is crucial. Ignoring the likely inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices, the primary sensor and image processing will be the deciding factors.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). However, the Realme GT3 features slightly higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A710 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.75 GHz on the Reno9 Pro+), potentially offering a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The 4nm process node ensures good thermal efficiency, but the GT3’s focus on peak performance may lead to more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the specific speed isn’t provided. The CPU difference is subtle, but the GT3 aims for a slight edge.
Battery Life
The Realme GT3’s 240W charging is the standout feature, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes 31 minutes for a full charge. Both phones share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different capacities. The GT3’s charging speed dramatically reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Reno9 Pro+ offers a more conventional charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you prioritize a more refined software experience, a potentially more consistent camera output (pending detailed camera testing), and a slightly more balanced approach to features. Buy the Realme GT3 if you absolutely need the fastest charging available, prioritize raw performance, and are willing to trade some software polish for cutting-edge speed. Gamers and those constantly on the move will benefit most from the GT3’s rapid refueling.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT3's 240W charging degrade the battery faster?
While extremely fast charging can theoretically contribute to battery degradation over the long term, Realme has implemented technologies like GaN charging and intelligent charging algorithms to mitigate this. These features regulate voltage and temperature during charging, minimizing stress on the battery. Real-world long-term testing is needed to fully assess the impact.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT3 throttle under heavy gaming loads?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a capable chip, but it can experience thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads. The GT3’s focus on performance may lead to more aggressive throttling compared to the Reno9 Pro+, which might prioritize thermal management. However, Realme likely includes cooling solutions to minimize this effect.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
The difference of 0.25 GHz on the Cortex-A710 cores is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks. It might translate to a slight performance advantage in CPU-intensive applications like video editing or demanding games, but the difference will be minimal for typical usage.
❓ What type of charging protocol does the Realme GT3 use to achieve 240W speeds?
The Realme GT3 utilizes Realme’s proprietary SuperDart Charge protocol, leveraging GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology for efficient power delivery. It also supports PD (Power Delivery) for compatibility with other chargers, but will not achieve 240W speeds with non-SuperDart chargers.
