Both the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ and the OnePlus 11R represent compelling options in the upper-midrange Android space, largely due to their shared Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset. However, subtle differences in CPU configuration and, crucially, charging speeds, create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone offers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 11R emerges as the stronger choice. While the Reno9 Pro+ offers a refined design, the 11R’s significantly faster 100W charging and slightly more aggressive CPU clock speeds provide a tangible advantage in daily use and gaming, all at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | PGW110 | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Potentially more refined design and build quality
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slightly higher Cortex-A710 clock speed (potentially better single-core performance)
- Slower 80W charging compared to the 11R
- May be priced higher than the 11R
OnePlus 11R
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Slightly higher Cortex-A710 clock speed
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Potentially less premium build materials
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are missing. However, the core processing power of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays smoothly. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone dynamically adjusts refresh rates for optimal power efficiency, potentially impacting battery life during static content viewing. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar overall design philosophies of both brands.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent beyond the chipsets. However, both Oppo and OnePlus typically prioritize camera performance in this segment. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of excellent image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both phones will offer a versatile camera system, but the Reno9 Pro+ might lean towards a more color-accurate, natural look, while the 11R could prioritize dynamic range and contrast, based on brand tendencies.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). However, the OnePlus 11R features slightly higher Cortex-A710 core clock speeds (2.5 GHz vs 2.75 GHz on the Reno9 Pro+). While seemingly minor, this difference can translate to a small but measurable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. Both phones utilize an octa-core configuration with 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 cores. RAM configuration is not specified, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5X for fast memory access. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps, but sustained loads could lead to throttling, potentially favoring the 11R with its slightly more aggressive cooling solution (based on OnePlus’s history).
Battery Life
The most significant difference lies in charging. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ supports 80W wired charging, reaching 100% in 31 minutes. The OnePlus 11R boasts 100W wired charging, offering a substantial time-to-full advantage. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 11R mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Reno9 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent from the 11R’s specifications, which could be useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you prioritize a potentially more premium build quality and a slightly more refined software experience, and don't mind a slower charging speed. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you value rapid charging, maximizing performance within a budget, and a more straightforward, performance-focused Android experience. Gamers and power users will find the 11R particularly appealing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the OnePlus 11R's faster charging degrade the battery health faster?
While faster charging *can* contribute to slightly increased battery degradation over the long term, modern charging algorithms and battery management systems mitigate this effect. The 100W SuperVOOC charging on the 11R incorporates safeguards to protect battery health, and the convenience of rapid charging often outweighs the minimal potential impact on longevity.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither Oppo nor OnePlus typically include microSD card slots in their flagship or upper-midrange devices. Both the Reno9 Pro+ and the 11R are likely to rely solely on internal storage, so choosing a model with sufficient capacity upfront is crucial.
❓ How will the slightly different CPU clock speeds affect gaming performance?
The 11R's marginally higher Cortex-A710 clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.75 GHz) will likely result in a small performance uplift in CPU-bound games. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's GPU is the primary driver of gaming performance, and the difference in CPU clock speeds will be less noticeable in most graphically intensive titles. Both phones should deliver a smooth gaming experience.
