Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs Honor Magic5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic5 Pro emerges as the stronger overall package. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers superior performance and efficiency, complemented by exceptional battery life. While the Reno9 Pro+ boasts incredibly fast 80W charging, the Magic5 Pro’s more efficient processor mitigates the charging speed advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Honor Magic5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.12" 1.4µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", AF TOF 3D (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5100 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5450 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Black, Meadow Green, Blue, Purple, Orange |
| Models | PGW110 | PGT-AN10, PGT-N19 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | £ 799.99 / € 407.79 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 4378 (v5.1), 5096 (v6) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Oppo's typically vibrant image processing
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Limited display brightness information
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Exceptional battery life (12:06h active use)
- Brighter display (1227 nits)
- Slower wired charging (66W)
- Potentially higher price
- Image processing may be less 'social media ready'
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1227 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno9 Pro+. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Magic5 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Magic5 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior panel with deeper blacks. Details regarding the Reno9 Pro+'s display technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) are missing, making a complete assessment difficult, but the Magic5 Pro clearly holds an advantage in raw brightness and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera capabilities, but specific details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the focus should be on image processing algorithms and software features. The Reno9 Pro+ likely emphasizes a vibrant, social-media-ready aesthetic, typical of Oppo. The Magic5 Pro, given Honor’s history, may lean towards a more natural and detailed image profile. The absence of details regarding OIS and video recording capabilities hinders a comprehensive assessment. We can assume both offer capable video recording, but the Magic5 Pro’s newer ISP within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 could provide an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the Oppo Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and improved GPU performance. The Magic5 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is more efficient and powerful than the Reno9 Pro+'s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. While both use a 4nm process, the Gen 2’s architectural improvements yield better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance. Its active use score of 12:06h and endurance rating of 115h significantly outperform the Reno9 Pro+'s unspecified battery performance. While the Reno9 Pro+ offers incredibly fast 80W wired charging (45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min) and reverse wired charging, the Magic5 Pro’s 66W wired, 50W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless options, combined with the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, result in a more practical and user-friendly experience. The Reno9 Pro+'s reliance on faster charging suggests a smaller battery capacity or higher power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently need to top up your phone quickly. It’s ideal for users who don’t mind potentially shorter battery life in exchange for that convenience. Buy the Honor Magic5 Pro if you value sustained performance, all-day battery life, and a more modern chipset. This phone is best suited for power users, gamers, and those who demand longevity from their device.