Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in computational photography, offering a more refined and consistently excellent camera experience, alongside Google’s exclusive software features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | PGW110 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 740 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially better CPU performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera performance relies heavily on hardware, less computational advantage
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography and image processing
- Google’s exclusive software features (Magic Eraser, Call Screen)
- Excellent display brightness and contrast
- Slow 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 chip may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Reno9 Pro+'s display specs aren't provided, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Reno9 Pro+ is a key omission, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s adaptive refresh rate (likely LTPO) contributes to battery efficiency. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but a direct comparison requires physical assessment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as excelling in photo and video, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro’s strength lies in its computational photography, leveraging Google’s algorithms to produce consistently excellent images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing pipeline is renowned for its dynamic range and accurate color reproduction. The Reno9 Pro+’s camera system, while likely capable, relies more on hardware specifications. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Pixel 7 Pro. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Super Res Zoom is a significant advantage, offering impressive detail at long ranges.
Performance
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chip, utilizing a different core arrangement – two Cortex-X1 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally offers better power efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Reno9 Pro+’s CPU architecture, with newer Cortex-A710 cores, should provide a performance edge in multi-threaded tasks. However, the Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno9 Pro+). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ supports 80W wired charging, achieving 45% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 31 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Reno9 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro provides reverse wireless charging. The Reno9 Pro+'s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing without throttling, and if minimizing charging downtime is critical. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize camera versatility and image processing quality, and value Google’s AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen.