Xiaomi 13T vs Oppo Reno9 Pro: Which Dimensity Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno9 Pro’s 8100 Max, coupled with exceptional battery life – lasting over 12 hours of active use. While both offer 67W charging, the 13T’s endurance gives it an edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PGX110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 470 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Sleek and stylish design
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Likely strong selfie camera performance
- Dimensity 8100 Max is outperformed by the 8200 Ultra
- Battery life likely inferior to the Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi 13T
- More powerful Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset
- Exceptional battery life (12:23h active use)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Design may be less premium than the Reno9 Pro
- Camera details are currently limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno9 Pro. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 13T’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing for both, but considering the market segment, 120Hz and a high PWM rate are expected. Color accuracy is also unknown, but both brands typically deliver well-calibrated displays.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for both devices. However, the Xiaomi 13T’s positioning suggests a more robust camera system. While sensor size and aperture are unknown, Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera performance in its 'T' series. The Reno9 Pro likely focuses on a balance of features, potentially emphasizing selfie capabilities. Without specific details, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera quality, but the 13T’s brand history suggests a stronger emphasis on photographic capabilities.
Performance
The Xiaomi 13T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra represents a clear step up from the Oppo Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max. The 8200 Ultra features a more refined CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – versus the Reno9 Pro’s 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster single-core and multi-core performance. Furthermore, the 8200 Ultra is fabricated on a 4nm process, offering improved thermal efficiency compared to the Reno9 Pro’s 5nm process, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5X RAM, but the 13T’s chipset will better utilize its bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 12:23h of active use and an endurance rating of 101 hours. The Oppo Reno9 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 67W charging (similar to the 13T) suggests a focus on quick top-ups. Both support PD and QC standards. The 13T’s superior endurance, however, means less reliance on frequent charging, making it ideal for users who are away from power outlets for extended periods. Both phones reach 100% charge in approximately 42-44 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you prioritize a sleek design and are comfortable with slightly less raw processing power. It’s a good choice for everyday tasks and social media. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you demand more from your phone – gaming, video editing, or heavy multitasking – and value long-lasting battery life. It’s the better option for power users.