Oppo Reno9 Pro vs vivo X90 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-out performance and camera prowess, the vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and faster charging significantly outperform the Reno9 Pro. However, the Reno9 Pro offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking a stylish and capable phone at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Black, Red |
| Models | PGX110 | V2227A |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Stylish design and build quality
- Less powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Inferior camera performance compared to the X90 Pro+
- No wireless charging
vivo X90 Pro+
- Industry-leading Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Superior camera system with advanced ISP
- 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potential for increased heat generation under heavy load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
- Larger size and weight (likely)
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-quality AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies beneath the hood. We can infer that the Reno9 Pro, given its market positioning, may prioritize a slightly more power-efficient panel. The X90 Pro+, with its focus on premium features, likely incorporates LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, maximizing battery life during static content viewing. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the X90 Pro+’s higher price point suggests a potential edge in display calibration and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
The X90 Pro+ is expected to dominate in the camera department. While specific sensor details are missing, the X90 Pro+’s positioning suggests a larger main sensor, potentially with a wider aperture, allowing for better low-light performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling superior image processing and noise reduction. The Reno9 Pro will likely offer a competent camera system, but it won’t reach the same level of detail, dynamic range, or low-light capability as the X90 Pro+. We can assume both phones will feature optical image stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The vivo X90 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap over the Oppo Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a noticeable advantage in single-core tasks, while its improved Cortex-A715 and A710 cores offer superior multi-core performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max is still a capable chip, but it will struggle to match the X90 Pro+ in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The vivo X90 Pro+ boasts a clear advantage in charging speed with its 80W wired charging, achieving a full charge in a claimed 33 minutes. The Oppo Reno9 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes 44 minutes to reach 100%. The X90 Pro+ also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno9 Pro. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the X90 Pro+ effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. The inclusion of reverse wired charging on both devices offers convenient top-ups for accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you need a stylish, well-rounded smartphone with fast charging and a smooth user experience, and are willing to trade some raw processing power for a potentially lower price. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the absolute best performance, a class-leading camera system, and don't mind paying a premium for it. Gamers and content creators will particularly benefit from the X90 Pro+'s superior chipset.