Oppo Reno9 Pro vs vivo V27: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno9 Pro edges out the vivo V27 thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 8100 Max chipset and quicker charging. While the V27 boasts impressive display brightness and endurance, the Reno9 Pro's performance advantage makes it the more appealing choice for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | PGX110 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 8100 Max)
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Stylish Design
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially less battery life than V27
- Camera performance needs further testing
vivo V27
- Excellent Battery Life (134h Endurance Rating)
- High Display Brightness (1055 nits)
- Stylish Design
- Fast Charging (66W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Performance may lag in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes the lead in display brightness, reaching a measured 1055 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks. The Reno9 Pro's display is likely very good, but lacks the V27's peak brightness. Both likely feature OLED panels with vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having excellent camera capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The vivo V27 is likely to emphasize color science and pleasing aesthetics, while the Reno9 Pro might offer slightly more detail and dynamic range due to its more powerful processor assisting image processing. Both likely feature versatile multi-lens setups.
Performance
Here, the Oppo Reno9 Pro shines. The Dimensity 8100 Max is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Dimensity 7200 found in the vivo V27. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno9 Pro. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Reno9 Pro's CPU offer a significant performance boost over the V27's Cortex-A715.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 claims an impressive endurance rating of 134 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Oppo Reno9 Pro's 67W charging is significantly faster, allowing for a full charge in approximately 44 minutes, while the V27 takes closer to 19 minutes to reach 50%. While the V27 likely has a larger battery capacity, the Reno9 Pro's charging speed compensates for any potential difference.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno9 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance and fast charging. Gamers and those who frequently multitask will appreciate its powerful chipset. The vivo V27 is a great option for those who value long battery life, a bright display, and a stylish design, especially if performance isn't their top priority.