Oppo Reno9 Pro vs vivo iQOO 11S: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, all-around experience, the vivo iQOO 11S emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance leap over the Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max, and the 200W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. However, the Reno9 Pro remains a strong contender for those seeking a more balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PGX110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Potentially more stylish design (brand reputation)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable 67W fast charging
- Dimensity 8100 Max is outperformed by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower charging compared to iQOO 11S
vivo iQOO 11S
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Revolutionary 200W SuperCharge technology
- Likely superior camera performance
- May be less focused on design aesthetics
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, both phones likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. The iQOO 11S, given its flagship positioning, likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The Reno9 Pro may focus on color calibration for a more natural look. The absence of LTPO in either spec sheet suggests both may not dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving, though this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the iQOO 11S, being a flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more capable than the Dimensity 8100 Max’s. While both phones likely offer versatile camera systems, the iQOO 11S is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume both will have a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a telephoto lens, but sensor size and aperture will be critical.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is built on a more efficient node than the Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). This translates to superior thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU architecture – featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core – offers a significant advantage in single-core tasks, while its Adreno GPU will deliver a noticeably better gaming experience. The Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max is still a capable chip, but it will struggle to match the iQOO 11S in demanding scenarios. The iQOO 11S likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its performance.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W charging is the standout feature here. This technology can fully charge the phone in under 30 minutes, a massive advantage over the Reno9 Pro’s 67W charging (44 minutes to 100%). While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 11S’s superior charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Reno9 Pro’s 67W charging is still respectable, but it can’t compete with the iQOO 11S’s blazing-fast speeds. The iQOO 11S also supports PD3.0 and UFCS, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you need a stylish, well-rounded smartphone with a focus on design and a capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you prioritize raw performance, lightning-fast charging, and are a demanding user who frequently engages in resource-intensive activities like gaming or video editing.