The Oppo Reno9 Pro and Realme GT Neo5 SE represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Reno9 Pro, with its established brand and refined design, faces off against the GT Neo5 SE, a performance-focused contender boasting incredibly fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing balanced performance and a polished experience, the Oppo Reno9 Pro emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8100 Max offers robust performance, and the 67W charging is sufficient for most. However, gamers and power users will find the Realme GT Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 and 100W charging more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 193.1 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Black, Gradient |
| Models | PGX110 | RMX3700, RMX3701 |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 270 EUR |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Refined and polished user experience
- Robust performance from Dimensity 8100 Max
- Good charging speed (67W)
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Slower charging than the GT Neo5 SE
Realme GT Neo5 SE
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- Potentially better thermal management
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo
- Design may be more aggressive, not appealing to all
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on market segment), specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. However, the focus here is on the chipsets. The display quality will likely be similar, with both aiming for vibrant colors and good viewing angles. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends. Color accuracy will be a key differentiator, but without specific data, it's difficult to assess.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Realme GT Neo5 SE, being a GT series phone, may prioritize a more vibrant, contrast-rich image processing style, appealing to social media users. The Reno9 Pro, aligning with Oppo’s aesthetic, might lean towards more natural color reproduction. Sensor size and aperture are crucial, but absent from the data. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a significant advantage for either device, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume both will have a multi-camera setup, but the quality of the secondary lenses (ultrawide, macro) is likely to be similar in both.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Realme GT Neo5 SE’s Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency over the Oppo Reno9 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 utilizes a 1x Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 2.91 GHz, offering a performance advantage in single-core tasks and burst workloads. The Dimensity 8100 Max relies on four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.85 GHz. While the Dimensity is still powerful, the Snapdragon’s newer architecture and 4nm process translate to better thermal management and sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The GT Neo5 SE is likely to exhibit less throttling under heavy load. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo5 SE’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer. It promises a full charge in a significantly shorter time than the Oppo Reno9 Pro’s 67W charging (44 minutes to 100% for the Reno9 Pro). While the Reno9 Pro’s 67W is still respectable, achieving 35% charge in 10 minutes, the GT Neo5 SE’s speed is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the GT Neo5 SE, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you need a well-rounded smartphone with a focus on everyday usability, a refined software experience, and a design that prioritizes aesthetics. Buy the Realme GT Neo5 SE if you prioritize raw performance for gaming, demand the fastest possible charging speeds, and are comfortable with a more aggressive, performance-centric approach to software and design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Realme GT Neo5 SE handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a capable chipset for gaming. Its Cortex-X2 prime core and Adreno GPU should deliver a smooth experience in Genshin Impact at high settings, though you may need to adjust graphics settings for sustained performance. The improved thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 8100 Max will also help prevent throttling during long gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Realme GT Neo5 SE compared to the 67W charging on the Oppo Reno9 Pro in real-world use?
The 100W charging on the GT Neo5 SE is significantly faster. While the Reno9 Pro can reach 35% in 10 minutes, the GT Neo5 SE will likely reach 50-70% in the same timeframe. A full charge on the GT Neo5 SE could take as little as 30-40 minutes, compared to the Reno9 Pro’s 44 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Dimensity 8100 Max in the Oppo Reno9 Pro get noticeably hot during extended use, like video recording or gaming?
The Dimensity 8100 Max, being a 5nm chip, can generate heat under sustained load. While Oppo likely implements thermal management solutions, it may experience more throttling than the Realme GT Neo5 SE with its more efficient 4nm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 during prolonged gaming or video recording sessions.
