Oppo Reno9 Pro vs Reno8 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno9 Pro edges out the Reno8 Pro thanks to slightly faster charging and potentially refined software. However, the Reno8 Pro remains a strong contender, especially if you prioritize a slightly brighter display and are comfortable with a marginally slower charging speed. Both offer excellent performance and camera capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | Oppo Reno8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon |
| Models | PGX110 | CPH2357 |
| Price | About 470 EUR | ₹ 28,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Potentially Refined Software
- Stylish Design
- Slightly Lower Peak Brightness (potentially)
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Brighter Display (818 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (100h Endurance)
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Potentially Older Software
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals. The Reno8 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 818 nits, which is slightly higher than the Reno9 Pro, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Reno8 Pro also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value. Overall, display quality is excellent on both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer excellent camera systems, detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. Both are known for their portrait capabilities and video recording quality. The Reno9 Pro may have slightly improved image processing algorithms based on its newer release, but both deliver competitive results.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max chipset and Octa-core CPU, meaning performance should be very similar in everyday tasks and gaming. Minor software optimizations in the Reno9 Pro might provide a slight edge in responsiveness, but it's unlikely to be noticeable for most users.
Battery Life
The Reno8 Pro is advertised with an endurance rating of 100h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Reno9 Pro, while not explicitly stated, should also offer solid battery performance. The Reno9 Pro's 67W charging is faster than the Reno8 Pro's 80W, allowing for quicker top-ups (31 minutes vs 44 minutes for 100%).
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno9 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and appreciate the latest software features. The Oppo Reno8 Pro is a great choice for those seeking a reliable, stylish phone with a bright display and excellent battery life, and potentially a slightly lower price point.