The OnePlus 11R and Oppo Reno9 Pro represent compelling options in a crowded mid-to-high range smartphone market. The 11R, leveraging the proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, aims for raw power, while the Reno9 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max, focusing on a balance of efficiency and performance. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 11R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in demanding tasks, and the 100W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Reno9 Pro is a capable device, the 11R offers superior value for its price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | PGX110 | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Balanced performance with Dimensity 8100 Max
- Sleek and stylish design (likely)
- Fast 67W charging with reverse wired capability
- Performance lags behind Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Potentially less efficient thermal management
OnePlus 11R
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- Likely better gaming performance due to Adreno GPU
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Design may be less refined than the Reno9 Pro (speculation)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays, a standard for this price range. However, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. The Reno9 Pro's brand positioning suggests a focus on display quality, potentially offering slightly more accurate color reproduction. The absence of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling won't be as power-efficient as on higher-end models. Bezels are likely comparable, with both aiming for a modern, immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the OnePlus 11R, given its flagship aspirations, likely features a larger primary sensor than the Reno9 Pro. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP also offers advanced image processing capabilities. While both phones likely include standard features like OIS, the 11R’s superior processing power could result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Reno9 Pro may focus on a more 'social media-ready' aesthetic with boosted colors, while the 11R might aim for more natural image reproduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 11R’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offering a significant single-core performance advantage over the Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max. The 8+ Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU also surpasses the Mali-G610 MC4 in the Reno9 Pro, translating to higher frame rates in graphically intensive games. While the Dimensity 8100 Max is efficient, the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally leads to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of sustained throttling under heavy load. The 11R’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances performance compared to the Reno9 Pro’s likely LPDDR5.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 11R’s 100W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in around 25-30 minutes. The Oppo Reno9 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes approximately 44 minutes to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 11R mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency also contributes to potentially longer real-world battery life, despite the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you prioritize a sleek design and a balanced experience with good all-around performance. It's ideal for everyday users who don't heavily rely on intensive gaming or demanding applications. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you demand maximum performance for gaming, multitasking, or content creation, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It’s the better choice for power users and those who want a phone that can keep up with their fast-paced lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the OnePlus 11R overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm process and OnePlus’s thermal management solutions are designed to mitigate overheating. It's likely to experience some thermal throttling after extended periods of intense gaming, but it should perform better than older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 devices. The 11R’s larger vapor chamber cooling system (likely) will help maintain sustained performance.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo Reno9 Pro slow compared to the 100W on the OnePlus 11R?
While 67W is still considered fast charging, the 100W on the OnePlus 11R is significantly quicker. The Reno9 Pro takes approximately 44 minutes for a full charge, while the 11R can achieve a full charge in around 25-30 minutes. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Dimensity 8100 Max in the Oppo Reno9 Pro handle demanding apps and multitasking well?
The Dimensity 8100 Max is a capable processor and will handle most everyday tasks and multitasking without issue. However, it won't match the raw performance of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the OnePlus 11R, especially when running resource-intensive applications or engaging in heavy multitasking.
