Oppo Reno9 Pro vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and software experience, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the Oppo Reno9 Pro delivers exceptional value with its significantly faster 67W charging and competitive performance from the Dimensity 8100 Max, making it ideal for power users who dislike waiting for their phone to charge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 35% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | PGX110 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 470 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Significantly faster 67W wired charging
- Competitive performance with Dimensity 8100 Max
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Camera system likely less advanced than Pixel 7 Pro
- Software updates may be less frequent
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s AI processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1090 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno9 Pro. While the Reno9 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly with HDR content. The Pixel 7 Pro’s larger display size (assumed, based on market positioning) also contributes to a more immersive experience. The Reno9 Pro may offer a higher refresh rate, but without specific data, it’s difficult to quantify the difference.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor G2 chip for advanced image processing. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is expected to excel in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image quality. The Reno9 Pro likely focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready images. The Pixel 7 Pro’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from Google’s video stabilization and processing algorithms. Ignoring the likely presence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices, the core camera systems represent a key differentiator.
Performance
Both phones utilize 5nm chipsets, but their architectures differ significantly. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 features a prime Cortex-X1 core (2x2.85 GHz) for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Reno9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 Max employs four Cortex-A78 cores (4x2.85 GHz) and four A55 cores. While clock speeds are similar, the Tensor G2’s X1 core provides a performance advantage in single-threaded tasks. However, the Reno9 Pro’s four A78 cores may offer better sustained multi-core performance. Both devices are expected to handle demanding tasks smoothly, but the Tensor G2’s integrated AI capabilities give the Pixel 7 Pro an edge in machine learning-based applications.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno9 Pro and Google Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging approaches. However, the Reno9 Pro’s 67W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W charging. The Reno9 Pro can reach 35% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 44 minutes, while the Pixel 7 Pro requires 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features the Reno9 Pro also supports with reverse *wired* charging. The Reno9 Pro’s faster wired charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro if you need blazing-fast charging, prioritize raw performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate a more streamlined Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera system with advanced AI features, a polished software experience with guaranteed updates, and a brighter, more vibrant display.