The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two strong contenders against each other: the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ and the vivo V27 Pro. Both offer premium features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one deserves your attention.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ takes the lead with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, offering significantly faster performance. However, the vivo V27 Pro boasts exceptional battery life and a vibrant display. Ultimately, the Reno9 Pro+ is for performance enthusiasts, while the V27 Pro excels in longevity and visual experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, eSE, HCE, UICC, NFC-SIM | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 1-10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised)
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | PGW110 | V2230 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Flagship Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Chipset
- Extremely Fast 80W Charging
- Premium Build Quality
- Likely Excellent Camera Performance
- Battery life may not match V27 Pro
- Potentially Higher Price
vivo V27 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life (121h Endurance Rating)
- Bright and Vibrant Display (978 nits)
- Stylish Design
- Good Value for Money
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 8200)
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Performance not as high as Reno9 Pro+
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro shines with its measured 978 nits peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno9 Pro+ display is also good, it lacks the same level of measured brightness data. The V27 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, but the V27 Pro has a slight edge in overall display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric devices, but specifics are limited in the provided data. We can assume both offer versatile camera systems with multiple lenses. The Reno9 Pro+ likely benefits from the processing power of its chipset for better image processing. The V27 Pro's camera is likely optimized for vibrant, social-media-ready photos. A deeper dive into sample images and video quality would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Here, the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ dominates. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship chipset, significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 8200 in the vivo V27 Pro. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the Reno9 Pro+. The Dimensity 8200 is still a capable chip, but it's not in the same league.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+'s 80W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 100% in just 31 minutes (advertised). While the Reno9 Pro+ charges faster, the V27 Pro likely offers significantly longer usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+? Gamers, power users, and anyone prioritizing raw performance and fast charging. Who should buy the vivo V27 Pro? Users who value long battery life, a stunning display for media consumption, and a stylish design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ is significantly better for gaming due to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V27 Pro is expected to have significantly better battery life based on its endurance rating.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno9 Pro+ worth the extra cost?
If performance is your top priority, then yes. Otherwise, the vivo V27 Pro offers excellent value for money.
