Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs Oppo Reno8 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno9 Pro+ takes the lead thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, offering significantly faster performance. While the Reno8 Pro boasts excellent battery life and a bright display, the Pro+'s raw power and faster charging make it the overall winner for users prioritizing speed and responsiveness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Oppo Reno8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2022, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, eSE, HCE, UICC, NFC-SIM | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 1-10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon |
| Models | PGW110 | CPH2357 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | ₹ 28,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Faster charging (80W)
- Likely improved camera processing
- Premium build quality
- Potentially shorter battery life than Reno8 Pro
- Higher price
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (100h endurance rating)
- Bright display (818 nits)
- More affordable price
- Stylish design
- Slower performance (Dimensity 8100 Max)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates. The Reno8 Pro measures a peak brightness of 818 nits, which is impressive. While the Reno9 Pro+ doesn't have a measured brightness figure readily available, it's expected to be comparable or slightly higher. The Reno8 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, and real-world differences are likely minimal. Both offer excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno9 Pro+ likely has an edge in image processing and low-light performance due to the more powerful chipset. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the Pro+ is expected to have slightly improved image quality and video recording capabilities. Both phones will likely offer a variety of shooting modes and features.
Performance
This is where the Reno9 Pro+ truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a significant upgrade over the Reno8 Pro's Dimensity 8100 Max. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Pro+. The Cortex-X2 core in the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial boost for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Reno8 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Reno9 Pro+ has slightly slower charging (31 minutes to 100% vs 31 minutes for the Reno8 Pro), but its 80W charging is still very fast. While the Pro+ may not match the Reno8 Pro's sheer battery longevity, it should still provide a full day of use for most users.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ is ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who demands top-tier performance. The Oppo Reno8 Pro is a great choice for those prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price point without sacrificing too much in terms of features.