Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X6 Pro emerges as the clear winner, boasting a superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, faster charging (wired and wireless), a brighter display, and a generally more refined camera system. While the Reno9 Pro+ is a strong contender, the Find X6 Pro’s advancements make it the better overall choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, eSE, HCE, UICC, NFC-SIM | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 1-10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | PGW110 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Sleeker, more compact design
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Generally more affordable
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Less impressive camera system
- Slower charging speeds compared to Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Superior camera system
- Faster 100W wired & 50W wireless charging
- Brighter, higher contrast display
- Larger size
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1318 nits, significantly brighter than the Reno9 Pro+. While the Reno9 Pro+ has a good quality AMOLED display, the Find X6 Pro's contrast ratio (nominally infinite) and higher brightness offer a more immersive and vibrant viewing experience, especially outdoors. Both feature smooth 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
The Find X6 Pro’s camera system is a significant upgrade. While specific details are missing in the provided specs, Oppo's marketing and reviews consistently highlight the Find X6 Pro's superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and video recording. The Reno9 Pro+ has a capable camera, but it doesn't match the Find X6 Pro's overall capabilities. Expect better dynamic range, detail, and color accuracy from the Find X6 Pro.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Find X6 Pro provides a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Reno9 Pro+. While both are powerful, the Gen 2 offers improved efficiency and raw processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. Expect slightly faster app loading times and more consistent performance under heavy load on the Find X6 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Find X6 Pro boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours. The Find X6 Pro also has significantly faster charging capabilities – 100W wired, 50W wireless – compared to the Reno9 Pro+'s 80W wired charging. This means quicker top-ups and more flexibility in charging options.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+? Users prioritizing a slightly more compact design and a more affordable price point might find the Reno9 Pro+ appealing. Who should buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro? Those seeking top-tier performance, exceptional camera capabilities, and the latest charging technology should opt for the Find X6 Pro.