Oppo Reno9 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno9 Pro+ boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and blazing-fast 80W charging. However, the Find X3 Pro offers a mature software experience and excellent battery life. The Reno9 Pro+ wins on raw power, while the Find X3 Pro excels in longevity and potentially camera consistency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno9 Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 24 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, eSE, HCE, UICC, NFC-SIM | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 1-10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Mint | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | PGW110 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 740 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Modern design
- Likely improved camera processing
- Potentially less mature software
- Battery life may be slightly shorter than Find X3 Pro
- Availability may be limited
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance rating)
- Refined software experience
- Versatile camera system
- Wireless charging support
- Older processor (Snapdragon 888)
- Slower charging speed
- May be harder to find new
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the Reno9 Pro+ likely has a slightly more vibrant and modern panel. The Find X3 Pro's infinite contrast ratio is impressive, but real-world differences might be subtle. The Reno9 Pro+ likely has a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) for smoother scrolling, while the Find X3 Pro has a measured 774 nits max brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones have capable camera systems. The Find X3 Pro is known for its consistent image quality and versatile lens setup. The Reno9 Pro+ likely features improvements in image processing and low-light performance thanks to its newer chipset and potentially updated sensors. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but the Reno9 Pro+ has the potential to edge out the Find X3 Pro.
Performance
The Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a clear winner here. It offers a substantial performance boost over the Find X3 Pro's Snapdragon 888, resulting in faster app loading, smoother gaming, and improved multitasking. Expect noticeable improvements in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Find X3 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours. While the Reno9 Pro+'s charging is significantly faster (80W vs 65W), the Find X3 Pro's larger battery capacity provides longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and the latest hardware. The Oppo Find X3 Pro is a great choice for those seeking long battery life, a refined software experience, and a well-rounded camera system, especially if they can find it at a discounted price.