Oppo Reno8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 boasts faster charging and a slightly brighter display, while the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more powerful chipset and potentially better overall value. Ultimately, the Reno8 is a strong choice for those prioritizing speed and screen quality, while the Note 12 Pro appeals to users seeking performance and a more budget-friendly price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CPH2359 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Brighter Display (633 nits)
- Sleek Design
- Good Portrait Mode
- Slightly less powerful chipset than Note 12 Pro
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Higher Peak Brightness (890 nits)
- Generally better value
- Good all-around camera
- Slower Charging (67W)
- Design may be less premium
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 takes the lead in display brightness, measuring 633 nits compared to the Redmi Note 12 Pro's 890 nits. While both have 'infinite' contrast ratios (a nominal value), the Reno8's higher brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. Both offer vibrant colors and smooth visuals, but the Note 12 Pro's higher peak brightness provides a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Reno8 is known for its pleasing color science and portrait mode capabilities, while the Note 12 Pro often delivers sharper images and more detail. Both offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 generally outperforms the Reno8's Dimensity 1300 in benchmarks and real-world usage. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. While the Reno8 is still capable, the Note 12 Pro offers a more noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 demonstrates an impressive endurance rating of 105h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Redmi Note 12 Pro has an endurance rating of 97h and an active use score of 12:08h. While both offer solid battery performance, the Reno8's endurance rating suggests it might last slightly longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 is ideal for users who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a sleek design. It's a good pick for those who frequently consume media and appreciate a premium feel. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better choice for users prioritizing performance, gaming, and a more affordable price point without sacrificing too many features. It's a solid all-rounder for everyday use.