Oppo Reno8 vs Xiaomi Poco F4: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly brighter display (1003 nits vs 633 nits) and Snapdragon 870 chipset deliver a more responsive and visually immersive experience, especially for gaming and media consumption. While the Reno8’s 80W charging is faster, the Poco F4’s overall performance edge is more impactful.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | CPH2359 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Slightly better battery endurance rating
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Diminished display brightness compared to Poco F4
- Less powerful chipset for gaming and demanding tasks
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Much brighter display for outdoor visibility
- More powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower charging speed (38 minutes to 100%)
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a substantially brighter display, reaching a measured 1003 nits compared to the Reno8’s 633 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable outdoors, where the Poco F4 maintains visibility under direct sunlight while the Reno8 struggles. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical OLED performance. While neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), the brightness advantage clearly favors the Poco F4 for outdoor usability and HDR content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Given the Reno series’ historical focus on camera quality, it’s reasonable to assume Oppo has invested more in image processing algorithms. However, without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of any mention of a telephoto lens on either device suggests a reliance on digital zoom, limiting their long-range photography capabilities. We can assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely be the differentiating factor, and one we cannot assess with the given data.
Performance
The chipset is where these phones diverge significantly. The Poco F4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a proven performer, featuring an octa-core CPU clocked up to 3.2 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Reno8’s MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6nm). While the Dimensity 1300 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 870 generally offers superior sustained performance and GPU capabilities, making the Poco F4 the better choice for demanding games and applications. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to potentially better thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1300’s 6nm node, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 has an endurance rating of 105 hours, slightly exceeding the Poco F4’s 101 hours. However, this difference is marginal. The Reno8’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes. The Poco F4’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes 38 minutes to reach 100%. The Reno8’s reverse wired charging adds versatility. Despite the slightly better endurance rating, the Reno8’s charging speed is its primary battery-related advantage, appealing to users who need quick power boosts.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and a sleek design, and frequently use your phone for photography where quick top-ups between shots are essential. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you value raw performance for gaming, streaming, and multitasking, and demand a display that remains easily visible even in bright sunlight. The Poco F4 is the better choice for power users.