Oppo Reno8 vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?

The Oppo Reno8 and Xiaomi 12 Lite both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different philosophies. The Reno8 prioritizes raw processing power with the Mediatek Dimensity 1300, while the 12 Lite focuses on a sleek design and efficient performance with the Snapdragon 778G. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, the Oppo Reno8 is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset. However, the Xiaomi 12 Lite offers a brighter display and a more refined aesthetic, making it a compelling choice for everyday users.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno8 Xiaomi 12 Lite
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, July 182022, July 09
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, July 25Available. Released 2022, July 11
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in)159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight179 g (6.31 oz)173 g (6.10 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 642L
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanorama, HDRHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with dual speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Po 4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsShimmer Gold, Shimmer BlackBlack, Lite Green, Lite Pink
ModelsCPH23592203129G
Price£ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999€ 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15
SAR-1.09 W/kg (head)     0.73 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.60 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 105h Endurance rating 100h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker -28.7 LUFS (Average) -25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno8

  • Faster charging (80W vs 67W)
  • More powerful processor (Dimensity 1300)
  • Reverse wired charging capability

  • Lower peak display brightness
  • Less refined design (subjective)

Xiaomi 12 Lite

  • Brighter display (824 nits)
  • Sleeker and lighter design
  • Efficient Snapdragon 778G processor

  • Slower charging speed
  • Less powerful processor for demanding tasks

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 824 nits compared to the Reno8’s 633 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both phones share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Reno8’s display specifications lack detail regarding refresh rate or PWM dimming, potentially making the 12 Lite a safer choice for users sensitive to flicker if it employs a higher PWM frequency.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the Reno8’s potential for superior image processing is implied by its more powerful chipset, allowing for faster computational photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner. The absence of details suggests both phones likely target similar image quality levels, focusing on versatility rather than groundbreaking innovation. We can assume both will offer standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Reno8’s processing power could lead to better low-light performance.

Performance

The Oppo Reno8’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, features a more aggressive CPU core configuration – a 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside three 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (also 6nm) with its 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core. This architectural difference translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Reno8 in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 778G is known for its excellent efficiency and sustained performance, potentially mitigating the Reno8’s raw power advantage during prolonged gaming sessions. Both phones benefit from 6nm fabrication, offering a good balance between performance and power consumption.

Battery Life

The Oppo Reno8 offers an endurance rating of 105 hours, slightly exceeding the Xiaomi 12 Lite’s 100 hours. However, this difference is marginal. The Reno8’s 80W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes, compared to the 12 Lite’s 67W charging (50% in 13 minutes). The Reno8 also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the 12 Lite. While the 12 Lite supports PD3.0 and QC4, the Reno8’s faster charging speed ultimately provides a more convenient user experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno8 if you need a phone capable of handling intensive applications, frequent multitasking, and mobile gaming without compromise. Its faster charging also appeals to those constantly on the move. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you prioritize a vibrant display for media consumption, a lighter and more stylish design, and a smooth, efficient user experience for everyday tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 1300 in the Oppo Reno8 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1300 is a powerful chip, its thermal performance will depend on Oppo’s cooling solution. Given the 6nm process, it should be relatively efficient, but prolonged gaming at maximum settings could lead to some throttling. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G is known for its thermal efficiency, potentially offering more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi 12 Lite fast enough for daily use, or is the Reno8's 80W a must-have?
67W charging is still very fast and will top up the Xiaomi 12 Lite quickly. However, the Reno8’s 80W charging offers a noticeable time saving, especially for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phone. The 17-minute difference for a full charge can be significant for those with busy lifestyles.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 778G in the Xiaomi 12 Lite handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 778G is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to compromise on graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. Expect to play at medium settings for a consistent experience. The Oppo Reno8’s Dimensity 1300 will offer a significantly better gaming experience with higher frame rates and graphics settings.