Oppo Reno8 vs vivo V27: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the Oppo Reno8 thanks to its significantly brighter display, more efficient chipset, and longer battery life. While the Reno8 boasts faster charging, the V27's overall package provides a more premium and future-proof experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | CPH2359 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Slightly more compact design
- Good overall performance
- Lower peak brightness display
- Shorter battery life
- Older chipset
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- Longer Battery Life (134h endurance)
- More Efficient Chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Modern Design
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1055 nits is substantially higher than the Reno8's 633 nits, resulting in significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. Both offer infinite contrast ratios (nominal), suggesting deep blacks, but the V27's brightness advantage makes a noticeable difference in everyday use. Color accuracy is likely good on both, typical of modern AMOLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, both offer versatile setups with main, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses. Expect good image quality in well-lit conditions from both, with potential differences in dynamic range, color science, and low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable, supporting 4K resolution.
Performance
The vivo V27's Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4nm) offers a performance advantage over the Reno8's Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The Dimensity 7200's newer architecture and more efficient manufacturing process translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. While the Reno8's CPU has a slightly higher peak clock speed on one core, the Dimensity 7200's overall configuration is more balanced and efficient.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 demonstrates a significant advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 134 hours compared to the Reno8's 105 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage times between charges. While the Reno8 charges faster (80W vs 66W), the V27's larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset mean it will likely last longer overall.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 is a great choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more compact design. The vivo V27 is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, extended battery life, and a more modern chipset for smoother performance and future software updates.