Oppo Reno8 vs Reno7 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a slightly faster chipset and quicker charging, while the Reno7 5G edges out with superior battery endurance. Ultimately, the Reno8 offers a more modern processor, making it a better choice for performance-focused users, though the Reno7 5G remains a compelling option for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CPH2359 | CPH2371 |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 1300)
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Sleek Design
- Likely Improved Color Accuracy
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- Potentially Higher Price
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Longer Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- More Affordable
- Stylish Design
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Processor (Dimensity 900)
- Slower Charging (65W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar displays with a measured max brightness of around 633-635 nits, offering good visibility in sunlight. Both boast an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term indicating very high contrast). The Reno8 might have slightly improved color accuracy due to potential display panel refinements, but the difference is likely minimal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but specifics are missing. Generally, the Reno series focuses on portrait photography and vibrant colors. The Reno8 likely benefits from software optimizations and potentially a slightly improved sensor, but both should deliver good results in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is likely comparable.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Reno7 5G's Dimensity 900. The Dimensity 1300's higher clock speeds and improved architecture translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. While both handle everyday tasks with ease, the Reno8 is the clear winner for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G takes the lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 123 hours compared to the Reno8's 105 hours. However, the Reno8's 80W charging significantly reduces charging times, reaching 100% in just 28 minutes, while the Reno7 5G takes 31 minutes with its 65W charging. This makes the Reno8 more convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and fast charging, especially gamers or those who frequently multitask. The Oppo Reno7 5G is a great choice for users who value long battery life and a slightly more affordable price point, perfect for those who need a phone that can last all day and beyond.