Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish designs and impressive features. The Reno8 and Reno7 are two popular contenders, but which one offers the better value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and capabilities to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 edges out the Reno7 thanks to its significantly faster charging and more powerful chipset. While the Reno7 boasts superior battery life, the Reno8's performance and charging speed make it the more compelling choice for most users seeking a modern smartphone experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, April 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange |
| Models | CPH2359 | CPH2363 |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | About 240 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 105h
|
Endurance rating 127h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 619610a (v9)
GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Charging (80W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Shorter Battery Life (compared to Reno7)
- Potentially Higher Price
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional Battery Life (127h Endurance)
- More Affordable
- Reverse Wired Charging (5W)
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 680)
- Potentially Older Software
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology (likely AMOLED) with a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Reno8 has a slightly higher peak brightness of 633 nits compared to the Reno7's 624 nits, offering marginally better visibility in direct sunlight. Both likely have a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling (further research needed to confirm Reno7 refresh rate).
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed for their camera capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Reno8's newer chipset and potentially improved image processing algorithms could result in slightly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both likely feature a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset provides a substantial performance boost over the Reno7's Snapdragon 680. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Reno8. The Dimensity 1300's architecture is more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The Reno7 takes a clear lead in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 127-hour rating compared to the Reno8's 105-hour rating. However, the Reno8's 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes – a significant advantage over the Reno7's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a smoother overall experience. The Oppo Reno7 is a great option for those who value exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point, willing to compromise on speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 worth the extra money?
If you value performance and fast charging, the Reno8 is worth the investment. However, if battery life is your top priority and you're on a budget, the Reno7 remains a compelling option.
❓ What is the difference between the Dimensity 1300 and Snapdragon 680?
The Dimensity 1300 is a significantly more powerful chipset, offering better performance in all areas, including CPU, GPU, and AI processing. The Snapdragon 680 is a more entry-level chip designed for efficiency and affordability.
