Oppo Reno8 vs Oppo A98: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 offers significantly better performance and faster charging, alongside a brighter display. However, the Oppo A98 provides excellent value for money with a respectable feature set. If performance is key, the Reno8 wins; for budget-conscious buyers, the A98 is a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | Oppo A98 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue |
| Models | CPH2359 | CPH2529 |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno8
- Superior Performance
- Faster 80W Charging
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Battery Life (105h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Camera details are missing
Oppo A98
- More Affordable
- 67W Fast Charging
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Camera
- Lower Performance
- Less Bright Display
- Battery life not explicitly stated
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, offering a noticeably brighter and more vibrant viewing experience, especially outdoors. While the A98's display is adequate, it lacks the Reno8's brightness and potentially color accuracy. Both feature similar resolutions, but the Reno8's superior brightness gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno8 likely has an advantage in image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. While specific camera specs are missing, the Reno8's hardware and processing capabilities suggest superior image quality. Both likely offer standard features like portrait mode and HDR.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset significantly outperforms the A98's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1300 offers a more powerful CPU and GPU, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The A98 is sufficient for basic tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 claims an incredible endurance rating of 105 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The A98, while not explicitly stated, benefits from 67W fast charging, which is still impressive. The Reno8's battery life is likely superior, but the A98's charging speed helps mitigate any potential shortcomings.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8? Users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and a brighter display. It's ideal for gamers and those who frequently multitask. Who should buy the Oppo A98? Budget-minded individuals seeking a reliable smartphone with 5G connectivity and a decent camera for everyday use.