Oppo Reno8 vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Oppo Reno8 is the better choice. Its Dimensity 1300 offers a noticeable performance edge. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo counters with a significantly brighter display and the convenience of wireless charging, making it ideal for media consumption and those valuing battery flexibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | CPH2359 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8
- Faster charging (80W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 1300)
- Potentially better image processing
- Dimmer display
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- Wireless charging support
- More efficient processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging (68W)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a considerably brighter display, peaking at 1004 nits compared to the Oppo Reno8’s 633 nits. This difference translates to significantly improved visibility outdoors and a more impactful HDR experience. Both displays share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for OLED panels, but the Neo’s brightness is the defining factor. While neither manufacturer specifies refresh rates, the brightness advantage makes the Edge 30 Neo the clear winner for users who frequently consume content in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Assuming similar image processing pipelines, the Reno8 likely benefits from the Dimensity 1300’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) for faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Edge 30 Neo’s camera system is likely tuned for efficiency, prioritizing image quality within the constraints of the Snapdragon 695. Without specific sensor size or aperture details, it’s difficult to declare a definitive winner, but the Reno8’s chipset gives it a potential edge in image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6nm) is architecturally superior to the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 1300 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz versus the Edge 30 Neo’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 1300’s more robust CPU and GPU will deliver a more responsive experience, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. The Reno8 is the better choice for gamers and power users.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Reno8 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo achieve an endurance rating of approximately 104-105 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Reno8’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes. The Edge 30 Neo’s 68W charging is respectable, but the Reno8’s speed is a substantial advantage. Furthermore, the Edge 30 Neo adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno8, offering added convenience for users who prefer cable-free charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Its 80W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a vibrant, easily visible display, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and prioritize a more balanced power consumption profile for all-day use.