Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Oppo Reno8 Z: A Detailed Comparison

Both the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and the Oppo Reno8 Z target the competitive mid-range 5G market, relying on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in their approach to battery technology and charging speeds, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, reaching 100% in just 41 minutes compared to the Reno8 Z’s 63 minutes. While both share the same chipset, the Poco’s faster charging and comparable battery life provide a more convenient daily experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno8 Z Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2022, August 042022, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, August 04Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight181 g (6.38 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress)IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionSchott Xensation UpCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619
OSAndroid 12, ColorOS 12.1Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsStarlight Black, Dawnlight GoldLaser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow
Models-2201116PG
PriceAbout 350 EUR€ 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940
SAR-1.06 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.8 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno8 Z

  • Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
  • Sleeker design (speculation based on brand aesthetic)
  • Reverse wired charging capability

  • Significantly slower charging speed (33W vs 67W)
  • Longer charging time (63 minutes to full)
  • Limited information on display quality

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

  • Much faster 67W charging (full charge in 41 minutes)
  • Comparable battery life to Reno8 Z (119h endurance)
  • Reverse wired charging

  • Xiaomi's MIUI can be bloated with pre-installed apps
  • Potentially less refined design compared to Oppo
  • Limited information on display quality

Display Comparison

Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize 6.67-inch displays, but the Reno8 Z may offer slightly better color calibration based on Oppo’s historical focus on display quality. Without concrete data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner; the user experience will likely be similar.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature photo/video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The absence of specifics suggests neither phone boasts a flagship-level camera system. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera (likely present on both) is questionable, offering limited image quality. Without knowing the main sensor size, aperture, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), it’s impossible to definitively assess camera performance. Image processing style will likely differ, with Oppo tending towards more vibrant colors and Xiaomi towards a more natural look.

Performance

The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) with an Octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). This means performance will be nearly identical in everyday tasks and most gaming scenarios. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance. The absence of LPDDR5x RAM specifications suggests both likely use LPDDR4x, limiting potential performance gains. Thermal management will likely be similar, with both phones potentially throttling under sustained heavy loads.

Battery Life

The Poco X4 Pro 5G and Reno8 Z both boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the critical difference lies in charging speed. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, delivers a full charge in just 41 minutes, while the Reno8 Z’s 33W wired charging (also PD-compatible) takes 63 minutes. This 22-minute difference is significant, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Poco also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Reno8 Z.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno8 Z if you prioritize a potentially sleeker design and are less concerned with rapid charging. Its 33W charging is adequate for overnight top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value minimizing downtime and require a phone that can quickly recover from heavy usage, making it ideal for power users and those frequently on the go.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable mid-range chipset, but it's not designed for ultra-high settings in graphically intensive games. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth and consistent frame rate in PUBG or Genshin Impact on both the Poco X4 Pro 5G and the Oppo Reno8 Z. Expect some frame drops during intense action sequences.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely to degrade the battery health faster than the 33W charging on the Reno8 Z?
While faster charging *can* theoretically contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, the difference is likely to be minimal in this case. Modern smartphones employ sophisticated battery management systems to mitigate the effects of fast charging. The convenience of the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging likely outweighs the potential for a small reduction in long-term battery health.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Xiaomi's MIUI?
Oppo's ColorOS is generally considered to be a more polished and refined software experience, with a cleaner interface and fewer pre-installed apps. Xiaomi's MIUI, while feature-rich, is often criticized for being bloated with unnecessary apps and advertisements. However, MIUI offers greater customization options. The choice depends on your preference for a streamlined or highly customizable experience.