Oppo Reno8 Z vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno8 Z’s Snapdragon 695, and the significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer. While both offer similar battery endurance, the 12 Lite’s superior processing power makes it better suited for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Z | Xiaomi 12 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, July 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Models | - | 2203129G |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- Potentially lower price point
- Balanced feature set
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Faster Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Brighter display (824 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 824 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno8 Z. This difference is significant for outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the 12 Lite’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more visually immersive experience. Bezels are likely comparable, but the 12 Lite’s overall display quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. We can assume both will feature a multi-camera setup, but the Reno8 Z’s camera system is likely more focused on general-purpose photography, while the 12 Lite may offer slightly more advanced features due to its higher-tier chipset’s image signal processor (ISP). The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unknown for both, but would be a significant advantage if present on either device. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses, the main sensor quality and image processing algorithms will be key differentiators.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno8 Z’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – versus the Reno8 Z’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the 12 Lite. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural differences favor the 778G.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC4) can reach 50% charge in just 13 minutes, while the Oppo Reno8 Z’s 33W wired charging (PD) takes 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for the 12 Lite, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Z if you prioritize a slightly more conservative price point and don't heavily rely on intensive mobile gaming or video editing. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you value faster charging speeds, smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, and a brighter, more vibrant display experience. The 12 Lite is the better option for power users.