The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 Z and vivo V25 are two strong contenders. Both offer attractive designs, capable cameras, and decent performance, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 edges out the Reno8 Z thanks to its brighter display, slightly faster charging, and exceptional battery life. While the Reno8 Z has a capable Snapdragon chipset, the V25's overall package provides a more compelling user experience for most.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue |
| Models | - | V2202 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 120h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Reverse wired charging
- Oppo's ColorOS
- Less bright display
- Slower charging
- Shorter battery life
vivo V25
- Brighter display
- Longer battery life
- Faster charging
- Stylish design
- Dimensity 900 chipset may not be significantly faster in real-world use
- Infinite contrast ratio is a marketing term
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 boasts a significantly brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 781 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno8 Z's display is adequate, it lacks the same punch. The vivo V25's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image depth, though this is a marketing term. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the vivo V25 likely has an edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The vivo V25's camera system is generally praised for its color accuracy and dynamic range. The Reno8 Z's camera is still good, but may not match the V25's overall quality. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8 Z utilizes a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, known for its efficiency and decent gaming performance. The vivo V25 features a Mediatek Dimensity 900, which generally offers slightly better raw processing power. However, real-world performance differences may be minimal for everyday tasks. Both chipsets are 6nm, indicating good power efficiency.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 120 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Reno8 Z. The vivo V25 also charges slightly faster with 44W charging (61% in 30 minutes) compared to the Reno8 Z's 33W charging (31% in 15 minutes).
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Z is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful chipset for gaming and those who appreciate Oppo's ColorOS. The vivo V25 is ideal for users who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a stylish design, especially those who take a lot of photos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno8 Z's Snapdragon 695 might offer a slight edge in some games due to Qualcomm's optimization, but both phones are capable of handling most mobile games at moderate settings.
❓ Does the vivo V25 have NFC?
Yes, the vivo V25 typically includes NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities. However, it's always best to confirm this with the specific retailer or model variant.
