Oppo Reno8 Z vs Oppo Reno8 Lite: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones share the same core chipset and charging capabilities. The Reno8 Z typically boasts a slightly better camera system and potentially a more refined design, while the Reno8 Lite might offer a more competitive price. It's a close call, leaning towards the Reno8 Z for camera enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Z | Oppo Reno8 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, June 4 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, June 4 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | - | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- Potentially better camera system
- Slightly more premium design
- Fast charging (33W)
- 5G Connectivity
- May be slightly more expensive
- Performance is adequate, not exceptional
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Competitive price
- Fast charging (33W)
- 5G Connectivity
- Good display quality
- Camera may be slightly inferior
- Design might be less premium
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. Differences might lie in the panel calibration or protective glass used, but these are often subtle.
Camera Comparison
The Reno8 Z is generally expected to have a slightly more advanced camera setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor or improved image processing algorithms. While both offer a triple-camera system, the Reno8 Z often edges out the Lite in image quality, especially in low light. Expect a 64MP main camera on both, but the Reno8 Z might have a better ultrawide and macro lens.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 695 5G, both phones deliver adequate performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Expect similar responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. However, software optimization could slightly favor one device over the other.
Battery Life
Both phones are equipped with a 4500mAh battery and 33W SuperVOOC charging, promising a full charge in roughly 63 minutes. Battery life should be comparable under typical usage scenarios.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Z is ideal for users who prioritize camera quality and a potentially more premium feel. The Oppo Reno8 Lite is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a 5G-capable phone with a good display and solid performance.