Oppo Reno8 Z vs Oppo Reno7 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the lead with its significantly faster 65W charging and the Dimensity 900 chipset, offering a performance edge. However, the Reno8 Z boasts a more modern Snapdragon 695 5G and a potentially more appealing design for some. It depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Z | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- Modern Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging Speed
- Less Powerful Processor than Reno7 5G
- Brightness data missing
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster 65W Charging
- More Powerful Dimensity 900 Chipset
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- High Brightness Display (635 nits)
- Older Design
- Potentially Less Refined Software Experience
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, offering better visibility in bright sunlight. The Reno8 Z's display is likely good, but lacks specific brightness data. Contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the Reno7 5G, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno8 Z's display is expected to be good, but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more detailed testing. Both phones are expected to deliver good image quality in well-lit conditions. The Reno7 5G's camera system likely offers slightly better low-light performance due to the Dimensity 900's image signal processor (ISP). Specific camera features and video recording capabilities should be researched further.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset generally outperforms the Reno8 Z's Snapdragon 695 5G in benchmarks and real-world usage. Expect smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming on the Reno7 5G. The Reno8 Z is still capable for everyday tasks, but may struggle with more demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Reno8 Z's battery capacity is likely similar, its charging speed is slower at 33W compared to the Reno7 5G's 65W. This means the Reno7 5G charges significantly faster.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Z is ideal for users prioritizing a modern design, 5G connectivity, and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno7 5G is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.