OnePlus Nord 2T vs Oppo Reno8 Z: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Reno8 Z’s Snapdragon 695, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is dramatically faster. However, the Reno8 Z remains a compelling option for those seeking a more balanced device with a focus on efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Z | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Reverse wired charging for topping up other devices
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly slower charging speed (33W)
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Display specifications are less defined
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Powerful MediaTek Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Ultra-fast 80W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter display (636 nits)
- Potentially faster battery degradation due to fast charging
- No reverse wireless charging
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Nord 2T boasts a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Reno8 Z (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the Nord 2T, the Reno8 Z’s display specifications are less defined. The absence of refresh rate information for the Reno8 Z suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the Nord 2T is expected to offer a smoother 90Hz experience. This difference will be noticeable during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. The absence of specifics makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Nord 2T’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture, it’s hard to assess low-light performance. The Reno8 Z’s camera system is likely geared towards social media sharing, while the Nord 2T may offer more flexibility for enthusiasts. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Nord 2T, if present, would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s MediaTek Dimensity 1300, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core and three additional Cortex-A78 cores, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo Reno8 Z’s Snapdragon 695. The Dimensity 1300’s CPU architecture is more modern and powerful, translating to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 1300’s more complex design and higher clock speeds deliver superior performance. The Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games compared to the Nord 2T.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging can replenish the battery from 0-100% significantly faster than the Reno8 Z’s 33W charging (63 minutes vs. an estimated 90-120 minutes). The Reno8 Z does offer reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Nord 2T, allowing it to top up other devices. While the Nord 2T’s faster charging is convenient, it’s worth noting that extremely fast charging can contribute to faster battery degradation over time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Z if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and value long-term battery health due to its more conservative charging speed. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast 80W charging, even if it means potentially shorter battery lifespan over the long run.