Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs Oppo Reno8 Z: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its 68W charging dramatically reduces downtime, offsetting the Reno8 Z’s potentially more refined software experience. While both share the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, the Neo’s faster charging and brighter display provide a tangible advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Z | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 04 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@30/120fps, EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Dawnlight Gold | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Z
- Potentially smoother software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Sleek and understated design
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- Display likely less bright than the Motorola
- Limited camera specification details
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Blazing-fast 68W wired charging
- Brighter 1004 nit display for outdoor use
- 5W wireless charging support
- Software experience may not be as refined as ColorOS
- Camera image processing may be less vibrant
- Limited camera specification details
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno8 Z. This difference is crucial for outdoor usability, where the Neo will remain far more legible in direct sunlight. Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting standard OLED characteristics. While neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (LTPO or standard OLED), the brightness advantage clearly favors the Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Reno8 Z’s camera system is likely tuned for Oppo’s signature vibrant color profile, while Motorola typically aims for a more natural look. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lenses on both phones, the main camera performance will be the deciding factor, and without further data, it’s impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
Both the Oppo Reno8 Z and Motorola Edge 30 Neo are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world difference will likely come down to thermal management and software optimization, areas where Motorola and Oppo have distinct approaches. RAM configurations are not specified, but the Snapdragon 695 benefits from LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 support, impacting multitasking responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is its standout feature, promising a full charge in significantly less time than the Oppo Reno8 Z’s 33W charging (63 minutes to 100%). The Reno8 Z achieves 31% charge in 15 minutes, while the Neo’s charging speed is not specified for the same timeframe, but is expected to be substantially faster. Both phones share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar battery capacity, but the Neo’s charging speed mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Neo also adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno8 Z.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Z if you prioritize a potentially smoother software experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Its design language may also appeal to those seeking a more understated aesthetic. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you value rapid charging above all else, need a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and appreciate a more modern, eye-catching design. The Neo is ideal for users constantly on the go.