The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 T and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno8 T thanks to its faster charging, more powerful chipset, and brighter display. While the Reno8 T offers a sleek design and decent performance, the Redmi Note 12 Pro provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CPH2481 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 490 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490526 (v9)
GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Stylish Design
- Reliable Performance
- 33W Fast Charging
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Lower Brightness Display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Faster Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- 67W Fast Charging
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Design may be less premium
- Software experience can vary
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 890 nits max brightness, making it easier to view in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 T's display is perfectly adequate, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's infinite contrast ratio promises richer colors and deeper blacks. Both likely use AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a slight edge due to its potentially better image processing and sensor size. Detailed camera specs are missing, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro's reputation for good camera performance suggests it's the better choice for photography enthusiasts. Both likely feature a main sensor around 50MP.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro is noticeably more powerful than the Helio G99 in the Reno8 T. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Redmi Note 12 Pro. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant boost over the Reno8 T's Cortex-A76 cores.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro demonstrates exceptional battery life with an endurance rating of 97 hours and active use lasting 12:08. The Reno8 T's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Redmi Note 12 Pro's longevity. The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 12 Pro is also a major advantage, charging significantly faster than the Reno8 T's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T? Users prioritizing a stylish design and a reliable, if not blazing-fast, experience. Who should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro? Those seeking superior performance, faster charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display, especially for media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, offers significantly better gaming performance than the Oppo Reno8 T.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Redmi Note 12 Pro charges to 100% in approximately 46 minutes with its 67W charger, while the Reno8 T takes longer with its 33W charger.
