The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Reno8 T represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F5 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, while the Reno8 T focuses on a balance of efficiency, style, and affordability with the MediaTek Helio G99. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and demanding tasks like gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance leap over the Reno8 T’s Helio G99. However, the Oppo Reno8 T provides a compelling alternative for everyday users seeking a smooth experience and efficient battery life at a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Black, White |
| Models | CPH2481 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 490 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Significantly faster charging (67W wired, 30W wireless)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially lower battery efficiency due to powerful chipset
- May be more expensive than the Reno8 T
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Helio G99 chipset for good battery life
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Significantly lower performance compared to the F5 Pro
- Slower charging speed (33W wired)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno8 T. This makes the F5 Pro far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the F5 Pro’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The Reno8 T’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a focus on cost optimization rather than top-tier visual experience. We expect the Reno8 T to have a standard LCD or AMOLED panel, while the F5 Pro likely utilizes a high-quality AMOLED.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. However, given the F5 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Reno8 T likely relies on software processing to enhance image quality. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the F5 Pro’s overall hardware advantage suggests superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the Reno8 T will include a standard set of lenses, while the F5 Pro may offer more advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor featuring an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Oppo Reno8 T’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm). The G99, while efficient, utilizes older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 2.0 GHz respectively, resulting in lower overall performance. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The F5 Pro is the clear choice for gamers and power users.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco F5 Pro supports 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3+), reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, and even offers 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). The Reno8 T is limited to 33W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 54%. This faster charging capability gives the Poco F5 Pro a significant convenience advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 T if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't require extreme processing power for gaming or demanding applications. It’s ideal for social media, streaming, and casual use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for a significantly faster processor and brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm process and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) help mitigate overheating. Expect some warmth during extended gaming, but significant throttling is unlikely. The Reno8 T’s Helio G99 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno8 T slow compared to the competition?
Yes, 33W charging is relatively slow compared to the 67W wired and 30W wireless charging offered by the Poco F5 Pro. While it's not unusable, it will take considerably longer to fully charge the Reno8 T, especially from a low battery level.
❓ How does the Helio G99 in the Reno8 T handle graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Helio G99 can run Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. The Poco F5 Pro, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, can handle Genshin Impact at high settings with a smoother experience.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support expandable storage via microSD card?
No, the Poco F5 Pro does not support microSD card expansion. Users will need to rely on the internal storage options available at the time of purchase. The Reno8 T's microSD support is unconfirmed, but likely given Oppo's history.
