The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 T and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the crown thanks to its superior display, more efficient chipset, and longer software support. While the Reno8 T boasts faster charging, the A54's overall package of performance, camera quality, and longevity makes it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2481 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 490 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Faster charging (33W)
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Mediocre camera performance
- Shorter software support
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Powerful chipset
- Outstanding battery life
- Long software support
- Better camera
- Slower charging (25W)
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display shines with its 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Reno8 T's display is good, but lacks the same punch and outdoor usability. The A54's display is the clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 consistently delivers better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Its image processing is more refined, resulting in more natural-looking photos. The Reno8 T's camera is decent, but struggles to match the A54's consistency.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54, built on a 5nm process, generally outperforms the Reno8 T's Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). While both are octa-core processors, the A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking. Gaming performance is also slightly better on the A54.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 excels in battery life, consistently achieving over 11 hours of active use and boasting an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours. The Reno8 T's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A54's longevity. The A54's efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T? Users prioritizing fast charging and a stylish design on a tighter budget. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a vibrant display, excellent camera, and guaranteed software updates for years to come.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers significantly longer software support, with guaranteed updates for several years, providing peace of mind and ensuring your phone stays secure and up-to-date.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 T worth buying if I need fast charging?
Yes, the Reno8 T's 33W charging is a significant advantage if fast charging is a priority. However, consider if the trade-offs in other areas (performance, camera, software) are acceptable.
