The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 T and Samsung Galaxy A34 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 edges out the Reno8 T thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and longer software support. While the Reno8 T boasts faster charging, the A34’s overall package provides a more polished and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | CPH2481 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Stylish Design
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Dimmer Display
- Shorter Software Support (Likely)
- Average Camera Performance
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter Display (1009 nits)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Excellent Battery Life (133h Endurance)
- Longer Software Support (Samsung's Promise)
- Reliable Camera Performance
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Design Less Distinctive
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1009 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 T's display is adequate, it lacks the A34's punch and outdoor usability. The A34's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image depth, further enhancing its visual appeal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A34 likely has an edge in image processing and overall consistency. The A34's camera is known for its reliable performance in various lighting conditions. The Reno8 T's camera is decent, but may struggle in low light compared to the A34.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno8 T's Helio G99. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores offer superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming. While both phones handle everyday use well, the A34 feels smoother and more responsive.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 133 hours. This significantly surpasses the Reno8 T, ensuring all-day usage and beyond. While the Reno8 T's 33W charging is faster, the A34's superior battery capacity makes it the winner in this category.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 T is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a stylish design. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, reliable performance, and extended software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, generally offers better gaming performance than the Oppo Reno8 T.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A34 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates for its A-series phones, offering longer support than Oppo.
