Choosing between two excellent mid-range phones can be tough. The Oppo Reno8 T and Reno7 5G both offer stylish designs and capable features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G edges out the Reno8 T thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset, and potentially better display. However, the Reno8 T offers a more modern design and a slightly more efficient processor for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CPH2481 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Stylish Design
- Efficient Processor (G99)
- Decent Battery Life
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Unspecified Display Brightness
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Brighter Display (635 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Older Design
- Potentially Less Efficient Processor for Basic Tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, but the Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting it's brighter and more visible in sunlight. The Reno8 T's display is likely good, but lacks specific brightness data. The Reno7 5G also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, indicating excellent blacks and vibrant colors. While both offer smooth visuals, the Reno7 5G likely has a slight edge in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require in-depth testing. The Reno7 5G likely has a slight advantage due to its more powerful processor assisting image processing. Both phones likely offer similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Reno7 5G might handle low-light scenarios slightly better.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Reno8 T's Helio G99. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and apps, and quicker multitasking. The Reno8 T's G99 is still capable for everyday use, but the Dimensity 900 provides a more premium experience.
Battery Life
The Reno7 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Reno8 T's battery life is likely good, it doesn't match the Reno7 5G's longevity. Furthermore, the Reno7 5G's 65W charging is significantly faster than the Reno8 T's 33W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 T is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design, efficient performance for everyday tasks, and decent battery life. The Oppo Reno7 5G is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds, a more powerful processor for gaming and demanding apps, and potentially a brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 T worth buying?
The Reno8 T is a good option if you prioritize style and efficient performance for everyday tasks, and don't mind slower charging. It's a solid mid-range phone.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo Reno7 5G has better gaming performance due to its more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset.
