Oppo Reno8 T vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno8 T’s Helio G99, and the significantly faster 68W charging is a game-changer. While the Reno8 T offers a respectable experience, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior processing power and charging speed justify the potential price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 T | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 02 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 183 g (6.35 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 54% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CPH2481 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Oppo Reno8 T
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Limited battery life information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster and more efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wireless charging
- LCD display (not AMOLED)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Reno8 T (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize LCD panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness is a significant advantage. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and without specific color accuracy data, it’s difficult to definitively state which offers superior color reproduction. However, Motorola’s generally good calibration suggests a pleasant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data. However, the Edge 40 Neo likely holds an edge due to its more advanced chipset enabling better image signal processing. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. The Reno8 T’s camera setup is likely focused on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions, while the Edge 40 Neo’s processing capabilities could yield better low-light performance and dynamic range. We advise users to disregard the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices, as their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clear advantage over the Oppo Reno8 T’s Helio G99 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76). The A78 cores in the Dimensity 7030 are architecturally superior, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 7030’s more modern design translates to better efficiency and sustained performance. The Reno8 T will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Edge 40 Neo will feel noticeably snappier, especially during demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 80-hour endurance rating and 10:28h active use score demonstrate superior battery life compared to the Reno8 T’s 33W charging and 54% charge in 30 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant time saver. While the Reno8 T’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and longer endurance make it the clear winner for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 T if you prioritize a balanced experience and are looking for a reliable daily driver without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and occasionally play less demanding games. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value performance, fast charging, and longer battery life. This phone is better suited for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands a more responsive and efficient smartphone experience.