The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 T 5G and vivo V27 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly more powerful chipset, brighter display, and impressive camera capabilities. While the Reno8 T 5G boasts faster charging, the V27 Pro's superior performance and features justify its price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 01 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | CPH2505 | V2230 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster Charging (67W)
- More Affordable
- Stylish Design
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Less Camera Performance
vivo V27 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 Chipset
- Brighter Display (978 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (121h Endurance)
- Premium Design
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 978 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight compared to the Reno8 T 5G. While the Reno8 T 5G has a decent display, the V27 Pro's contrast ratio (infinite nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors. Expect a more immersive viewing experience on the V27 Pro.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the vivo V27 Pro likely holds an advantage. The Dimensity 8200 chipset often pairs with better image signal processors (ISPs), leading to improved image quality, especially in low light. Expect better dynamic range and more accurate colors from the V27 Pro. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but the chipset suggests a V27 Pro edge.
Performance
Here, the vivo V27 Pro shines. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno8 T 5G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games. The V27 Pro's CPU architecture also contributes to its superior processing power.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is faster, the V27 Pro's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset likely result in longer overall usage time. The charging speed difference is noticeable, but the V27 Pro's longevity is a significant factor.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a more budget-friendly option. The vivo V27 Pro is perfect for those seeking a premium experience with a powerful processor, vibrant display, and a versatile camera system, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo V27 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset.
❓ Does the Reno8 T 5G have faster charging than the V27 Pro?
Yes, the Reno8 T 5G has faster wired charging at 67W compared to the V27 Pro's 66W.