Oppo Reno8 T 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno8 T 5G and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the crown thanks to its superior display, significantly better battery life, and more powerful chipset. While the Reno8 T 5G boasts faster charging, the A54's overall package provides a more premium and long-lasting experience.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Reno8 T 5G	Samsung Galaxy A54

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	-	25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA

Launch
Announced	2023, February 01	2023, March 15
Status	Available. Released 2023, February 10	Available. Released 2023, March 24

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions	162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in)	158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	171 g (6.03 oz)	202 g (7.13 oz)
	-	IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)	1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size	6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio)	6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak)	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)	Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)	Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Mali-G68 MP5
OS	Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14	Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	-

Main Camera
Dual	108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide)	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple	108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens	50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR, panorama	-
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide)	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.3, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only)
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 4800 mAh	5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold)	Lime, Graphite, Violet, White
Models	CPH2505	SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W
Price	About 340 EUR	€ 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999
SAR	-	0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 119h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.6 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno8 T 5G

Faster 67W Charging
Sleek Design
Competitive Price

Weaker Performance
Less Bright Display
Shorter Battery Life

Samsung Galaxy A54

Excellent Display
Long Battery Life
Powerful Chipset
Water Resistance (IP67)

Slower 25W Charging
Higher Price
Samsung's UI (subjective)

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A54's display is a clear winner. Its 980 nits peak brightness offers excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, and the infinite contrast ratio provides stunning visuals. The Reno8 T 5G's display is good, but lacks the A54's vibrancy and brightness. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the A54's implementation is superior.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 likely has an edge. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded, and the A54's camera hardware is likely more advanced. The Reno8 T 5G's camera is decent, but may struggle in low-light conditions compared to the A54.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) generally outperforms the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in demanding tasks and gaming. While the Reno8 T 5G is capable for everyday use, the A54 offers smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119 hours is exceptional, and active use lasting 11:15 hours is impressive. The Reno8 T 5G's battery life is respectable, but falls significantly short of the A54's longevity.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design on a tighter budget. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those who value a vibrant display, exceptional battery life, and a more robust overall performance, even if it means slower charging.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?

The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset provides better gaming performance due to its more powerful cores and efficient architecture.

❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 T 5G worth it if I need fast charging?

Yes, the Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is a significant advantage if quick top-ups are a priority. However, consider if the trade-offs in other areas are acceptable.