Oppo Reno8 T 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes the crown thanks to its superior display, longer software support, and impressive battery life. While the Reno8 T 5G boasts faster charging, the A34's overall package offers better value and a more polished experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 T 5G | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 01 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | CPH2505 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Sleek Design
- Decent Performance
- Less Bright Display
- Shorter Battery Life
- Less Software Support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Excellent Display (Brightness & Contrast)
- Long Battery Life
- Samsung Software Support
- Versatile Camera
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Design Less Distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's 1009 nits peak brightness significantly outshines the Reno8 T 5G, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent image quality. While the Reno8 T 5G has a decent display, it lacks the A34's vibrancy and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Galaxy A34 likely has a more versatile setup, potentially with better image processing and low-light performance. The Reno8 T 5G's camera is good, but the A34's software optimizations and potentially larger sensor give it an edge.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno8 T 5G and the Dimensity 1080 in the Galaxy A34 are both capable mid-range chipsets. The Dimensity 1080 generally offers slightly better CPU performance, particularly in multi-core tasks, thanks to its Cortex-A78 cores. However, real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34's endurance rating of 133h is exceptional, indicating significantly longer battery life than the Reno8 T 5G. While the Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is faster, the A34's larger battery capacity means it will likely last much longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, extended battery life, and the reliability of Samsung's software updates.