Oppo Reno8 T 5G vs Oppo Reno8: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a significantly faster chipset and quicker charging, while the Reno8 T 5G offers 5G connectivity and a slightly more efficient processor. The Reno8 generally wins on performance, but the Reno8 T 5G provides a compelling alternative for those prioritizing 5G and potentially better battery efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 T 5G | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 01 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | CPH2505 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Efficient Processor (Snapdragon 695)
- 67W Fast Charging
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Processor than Reno8
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Less Camera Performance
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 1300)
- 80W SuperFast Charging
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Battery Life (105h Endurance)
- No 5G Connectivity
- Slightly Slower Charging than some competitors
- Potentially Less Efficient Processor
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 takes the display crown. While both offer vibrant visuals, the Reno8's measured 633 nits max brightness provides better outdoor visibility. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and a more immersive experience. The Reno8 T 5G's display is still good, but lacks the same punch.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Reno8's camera is expected to perform slightly better due to the more powerful processor assisting with image processing. Both likely offer similar primary sensor quality, but the Reno8's processing advantage could lead to better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset is noticeably faster than the Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1300's higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The Snapdragon 695 5G is capable, but not in the same league.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8's endurance rating of 105h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Reno8 T 5G's battery capacity is likely similar, the Snapdragon 695 5G's efficiency could provide comparable or slightly better real-world battery performance. However, the Reno8's 80W charging is a game-changer, charging significantly faster than the Reno8 T 5G's 67W.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G? Users seeking 5G connectivity on a budget and prioritizing potentially longer battery life. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8? Users who demand faster performance, quicker charging, and a brighter display.